Three-Qubit Entangling Gate via Two-Local Hamiltonian Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for implementing three-qubit entangling gates require significant experimental resources and are costly, involving multiple gates and complex control mechanisms, which increases the overhead and error rates in quantum computing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a three-qubit gate using two-local Hamiltonian control, specifically the CSZ gate, which performs a full or partial swap operation on qubits conditioned on the second qubit being excited, with frequency detunings and Pauli Z rotations to minimize resource requirements and reduce leakage errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current methods for implementing three-qubit entangling gates are used, then the gate functionality is achieved, but the experimental control resources required are excessive and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rateVSAvoidcontrol mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The three-qubit gate is decomposed into a sequence of two-qubit gates and single-qubit operations. The patent implements the three-qubit entangling gate by segmenting it into manageable two-qubit interaction steps, where each qubit pair interacts sequentially under controlled Hamiltonian evolution, reducing the overall control complexity while maintaining the entangling functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary two-qubit controlled-phase gate as a building block for constructing the three-qubit gate. This intermediary gate serves as a mediator that enables the construction of more complex three-qubit entangling operations from simpler, well-characterized two-qubit interactions, thereby reducing experimental control resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple gates and complex control mechanisms are used to implement three-qubit entangling gates, then the gate functionality is achieved, but the overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate implementation efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of gates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple gate operations into a unified two-local Hamiltonian control framework. By combining the control of two-qubit interactions and single-qubit operations under a single Hamiltonian evolution protocol, the system reduces overhead while achieving the same three-qubit entangling functionality with fewer discrete gate steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If current three-qubit gate implementation methods are used, then entangling functionality is achieved, but runtime is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate fidelityVSAvoidgate implementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic Hamiltonian control where the interaction strength between qubits is modulated in time during the gate evolution. By dynamically adjusting the coupling parameters and evolution time, the system achieves high-fidelity three-qubit entangling gates with optimized runtime, avoiding the need for lengthy sequences of static gate operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12159196B2Three qubit entangling gate through two-local Hamiltonian control
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12159196B2 patent drawing
  • US12159196B2 patent drawing
  • US12159196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and apparatus for implementing a quantum gate on a quantum system comprising a second qubit coupled to a first qubit and a third qubit. In one aspect, a method includes evolving a state of the quantum system for a predetermined time, wherein during evolving: the ground and first excited state of the second qubit are separated by a first energy gap ω; the first and second excited state of the second qubit are separated by a second energy gap equal to a first multiple of ω minus qubit anharmoniticity η; the ground and first excited state of the first qubit and third qubit are separated by a third energy gap equal to ω−η; and the first and second excited state of the first qubit and third qubit are separated by a fourth energy gap equal to the first multiple of the ω minus a second multiple of η.