Three-Rail Slide Assembly for Heavy Chassis Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slide rail assemblies face challenges in mounting heavy objects due to insufficient strength, leading to deformation or damage, and previous mounting methods are either inconvenient in limited spaces or require excessive space, lacking versatility.

Innovation Solution

A slide rail assembly with a first rail, a second rail, and a third rail, featuring a releasing feature and an engaging member that allows synchronous movement and detachment, enabling flexible mounting options by communicating apertures and holes for mounting heavy objects without requiring extensive space or lifting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the third rail is used to carry heavy objects, then the carrying capacity is improved, but the third rail may deform or damage due to insufficient strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrying capacityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The slide rail assembly is divided into three separate rails (first rail, second rail, third rail) that can be used independently or in combination. This segmentation allows the first and second rails to provide additional support when heavy objects need to be carried, while the third rail can still be used independently for lighter objects, thus preventing overload damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The third rail is designed to serve multiple functions: it can be used independently for mounting light objects, or in combination with the first and second rails for mounting heavy objects. This multi-functionality allows the same component to adapt to different load requirements without requiring separate structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Area of stationary object

If the drop-in mounting method is used to mount a chassis, then the mounting space is reduced, but the chassis must be lifted higher than the slide rail assembly which is inconvenient when located near the top position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting spaceVSAvoidmounting convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting process is segmented into two independent methods: Method 1 uses all three rails together for mounting, and Method 2 uses only the third rail for mounting. This segmentation allows users to choose the appropriate method based on the installation location and space constraints, improving operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides dynamic mounting options where the third rail can be detached from the first and second rails to create different mounting configurations. This dynamic reconfigurability allows the system to adapt to different spatial requirements during installation and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the inner rail is pulled out and detached for mounting, then the chassis can be mounted without lifting, but the mounting method requires larger space than the drop-in method

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting convenienceVSAvoidmounting space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The third rail is designed to function in multiple mounting configurations: it can be used as part of a three-rail assembly or detached as a standalone mounting rail. This universality allows the same component to serve different mounting needs without requiring additional parts or increasing space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of moving object

If the third rail is made stronger to carry heavy objects, then the carrying capacity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrying capacityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the third rail stronger and more complex, the system segments the load-bearing function across three separate rails. Each rail maintains a simple, lightweight structure, but when combined, they provide the necessary strength for heavy objects. This segmentation avoids increasing individual component complexity while achieving the required carrying capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10213017B2Slide rail assembly
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 KING SLIDE WORKS CO LTD
  • US10213017B2 patent drawing
  • US10213017B2 patent drawing
  • US10213017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A slide rail assembly comprises a first rail, a second rail, a third rail and an engaging member. The first rail comprises a releasing feature. The second rail is movable relative to the first rail. The third rail is movable relative to the second rail. The engaging member is pivoted to the second rail. Wherein, the engaging member is configured to engage with the third rail to allow the second rail and the third rail to be synchronously moved relative to the first rail along a first direction, and the releasing feature is configured to disengage the engaging member from the third rail when the second rail is synchronously moved with the third rail relative to the first rail to a predetermined position.