Three-Sided Bag Rack for Fuller Filling of Gusseted T-Shirt Bags

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic grocery bags are underutilized and wasteful due to their weak structure and lack of optimal packing efficiency, leading to increased environmental impact and operational inefficiencies in retail settings, where they do not maintain an erect shape on standard wire-arm bag racks, resulting in premature bag switching and reduced item capacity.

Innovation Solution

A three-sided bag rack and packing system that creates a defined physical frame for plastic, reusable, and paper bags, allowing for freestanding and efficient filling without human assistance, using handles to secure bags over hooks and loops, and a crossbar for item separation, enabling simultaneous dual bagging and uniform packing across various bag types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If plastic grocery bags are used on standard wire-arm bag racks, then bags can be dispensed efficiently, but bags cannot maintain an erect shape and do not stand freely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag dispensing efficiencyVSAvoidbag erect shape
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

A three-sided support structure acts as an intermediary between the wire-arm bag rack and the plastic grocery bag. The support provides a stable base and vertical walls that enable the bag to maintain an erect shape and stand freely, while still allowing efficient dispensing from the rack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the bag support environment by introducing a three-sided structure with specific height and width dimensions. This creates a confined space that maintains the bag's erect shape through structural constraints rather than relying on the bag's own structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If plastic grocery bags are underfilled to compensate for weak structure, then bag failures are reduced, but packing efficiency and volume utilization decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag structural reliabilityVSAvoidpacking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The three-sided support structure serves as a mediator that distributes and supports the weight of bag contents, reducing the structural burden on the plastic bag itself. This allows bags to be filled to their full capacity without compromising structural reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is prepared in advance to provide the necessary structural framework before the bag is filled. This preliminary structural support enables maximum filling capacity while maintaining bag integrity throughout the packing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If multiple plastic bags are grabbed at once, then bag dispensing speed increases, but bag waste increases due to sticking together

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag dispensing speedVSAvoidbag waste
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The three-sided support structure acts as a physical separator between individual bags, preventing them from sticking together even when multiple bags are handled simultaneously. This intermediary structure allows faster bag dispensing without increasing bag waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If plastic grocery bags are used instead of paper bags, then cost is reduced, but environmental impact and waste increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag costVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the usage parameters of plastic grocery bags by enabling them to be filled to their full capacity. This increases the number of items per bag, reduces the total number of bags needed, and consequently decreases environmental impact while maintaining the cost advantage of plastic bags.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9055829B1System and method for increased filling of plastic gusseted T-shirt bags
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 MARSH KARL
  • US9055829B1 patent drawing
  • US9055829B1 patent drawing
  • US9055829B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bagging system that permits one or two plastic bags to be filled at the same time, one of which can be filled more fully as it is supported by a three-sided support off from a three-sided bag rack. A cross bar can be used to help create two separate areas in which two plastic bags are filled. The same bagging system can also be used with non-plastic and non-standard bags by placing such bags inside of the system, between the three-sided support and the three-sided bag rack, and securing handles of the bag to the bagging system.