Three-Way Valve Circuit for Progressive Pressure Drop Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fluid circuits with 3-way valves face challenges in regulating flow between branches with differing pressure drops, leading to difficult control and increased fuel consumption due to sudden changes in pressure drop and flow rates.

Innovation Solution

A fluid circuit design featuring a three-way valve with an adjustment device comprising pistons and elastic elements that gradually adjust the opening and closing of orifices to manage pressure drop differences between branches, ensuring a progressive pressure drop along the valve stroke without increasing overall system pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple 3-way valve is used to manage flow between branches with different pressure drops, then the valve structure is simple, but the control becomes difficult because flow regulation is only effective along a small part of the piston stroke

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structureVSAvoidflow control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is divided into multiple independent orifices (first orifice and second orifice) that can be controlled separately. Each orifice has its own control mechanism allowing independent regulation of flow to different branches, enabling effective control across the entire piston stroke range rather than just a small portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve employs dynamic control mechanisms where pistons can move to different positions to progressively open or close each orifice. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the valve to adapt flow distribution throughout the complete stroke range, making control effective across all positions rather than being limited to a small segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the pressure drop of the low pressure drop branch is increased permanently to reduce flow inversion, then the flow control stability improves, but the overall system pressure drop increases leading to higher fuel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control stabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of permanently increasing pressure drop, the system uses dynamically adjustable orifices that can be opened or closed as needed. This allows the system to maintain stable flow control by actively managing pressure distribution through movable pistons and adjustable openings, rather than relying on fixed high pressure drop that would increase energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the orifices (opening area, position) dynamically based on operating conditions. By adjusting these parameters, the system can maintain stable flow control without permanently increasing pressure drop, thus avoiding the penalty of higher fuel consumption while still preventing flow inversion issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a simple valve is used without progressive pressure drop adjustment, then the device complexity is low, but sudden changes in pressure drop and flow rates occur making control difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure drop managementVSAvoidflow regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The flow path is segmented into multiple independent channels with separate orifices that can be controlled individually. This segmentation allows progressive adjustment of pressure drop across different branches, preventing sudden changes by distributing the pressure management across multiple controllable elements rather than a single abrupt transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements (adjustable orifices, control pistons) between the main pressure source and the branches. These intermediaries provide progressive pressure drop management by gradually adjusting flow resistance, preventing sudden pressure and flow rate changes that would occur with a simple valve design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for smoother control of flow rates between branches, reducing sudden changes and minimizing fuel consumption by compensating for pressure drop differences, enhancing the regulation of fluid flow in heavy-duty vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

the first piston is slidably mounted in the central channel and comprises an elastic element for returning it to a position closing the second orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4030085B1A fluid circuit for a motor vehicle technical field
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • EP4030085B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP4030085B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C

AI summary

The invention relates to a fluid circuit comprising a valve (3), the 3-way valve comprises a central channel (13) into which opens an inlet port (10), a first outlet port (11) and a second outlet port (12), the 3-way valve comprises an adjustment device (2, 3, 4) simultaneously ensuring the opening, respectively the closing of the first port (11) and the closing respectively the opening of the second port (12) of so that the closing speed of the first port (11) is faster than the opening speed of the second port (12).