Threshold Compactness Features for Cell Phenotype Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated image processing techniques are inefficient and inaccurate in distinguishing and classifying different cell phenotypes in digital images, particularly in identifying sub-cellular objects and distinguishing them from image artifacts.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of threshold compactness features, calculated using area and border length of provisional objects in images, allows for robust and efficient identification and characterization of morphological features, enabling more accurate cell phenotype classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing automated image processing techniques are used to detect and classify cell phenotypes, then the classification process can be standardized and performed with improved speed, but the techniques are incapable of accurately distinguishing among different cell phenotypes and are overly complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of cell classificationVSAvoidaccuracy of cell phenotype distinction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cell classification process into distinct morphological feature extraction steps, where each feature (area, perimeter, circularity, etc.) is calculated independently from digital images. This segmentation allows for systematic evaluation of multiple characteristics to improve classification accuracy while maintaining automated processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple morphological parameters (area, perimeter, circularity, aspect ratio, etc.) to characterize cells. By changing and evaluating multiple parameters simultaneously rather than relying on single-feature classification, the system achieves better phenotype distinction accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency through standardized formulas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If existing image processing techniques are used to identify sub-cellular objects, then automated detection can be performed, but the techniques cannot reliably distinguish sub-cellular objects from image artifacts or identify overlaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated detection of sub-cellular objectsVSAvoidaccuracy in distinguishing objects from artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the analysis into object detection, feature extraction, and classification stages. Each sub-cellular object is processed independently through standardized morphological measurements, allowing reliable distinction from artifacts through consistent quantitative criteria that can be automatically applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple morphological parameters (area, perimeter, circularity, aspect ratio, solidity) to characterize detected objects. By evaluating multiple parameters simultaneously, the system can reliably distinguish true sub-cellular objects from artifacts and identify overlapping objects, maintaining high automation while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If complex image processing techniques are used to achieve accurate cell classification, then morphological features can be identified, but the techniques become overly complicated and computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of morphological feature identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of processing technique
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs straightforward mathematical formulas for calculating morphological parameters (area, perimeter, circularity, aspect ratio, solidity) directly from digital images. These parameter calculations are computationally efficient and easy to implement, achieving accurate morphological feature identification without requiring complex processing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital image copying and processing, where standard image processing operations are applied to create binary masks and extract features. This approach simplifies the overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision through well-established computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Extent of automation

If existing image processing techniques are used for cell phenotype classification, then automated processing can be performed, but the techniques are computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of classification processVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent calculates morphological parameters using efficient mathematical formulas that operate directly on pixel data. The use of standard operations (counting pixels for area, tracing boundaries for perimeter, calculating ratios) minimizes computational requirements while maintaining full automation of the classification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs digital copying and binary mask operations to extract features from images. These operations are computationally inexpensive and can be performed efficiently on standard hardware, reducing the computational cost while maintaining automated processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP2776974B1Methods and apparatus for image analysis using threshold compactness features
Publication Date: 2021.01.20 PERKINELMER CELLULAR TECH GERMANY GMBH
  • EP2776974B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2776974B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2776974B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A new family of morphological features, referred to herein as threshold compactness features, is provided, useful for automated classification of objects, such as cells, in images. In one embodiment, one or more thresholds and/or binary masks are applied to an image, and one or more provisional objects within a cell in the image are automatically identified. The threshold compactness of the cell is computed as a function of area S of the one or more provisional objects and border length P of the one or more provisional objects. Computation of threshold compactness allows cells in an image to be distinguished and characterized. Compared to previous techniques, the methods and apparatus described herein are more robust and computationally efficient.