Threshold Notification Optimization in Service OAM

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In metro Ethernet networks, existing monitoring systems face inefficiencies in detecting and reporting threshold flapping events, leading to incomplete performance data and resource overload due to frequent SET and CLEAR traps generated by network devices when performance metrics cross and recross thresholds quickly.

Innovation Solution

Implementing enhanced network performance monitoring that tracks instances of threshold flapping over a configurable time period, generating a single FLAP trap with the total number of flaps and current state at the end of the period, rather than sending individual SET and CLEAR traps for each threshold crossing, thereby reducing message overload and providing comprehensive performance information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If individual SET and CLEAR traps are sent for each threshold crossing, then complete performance data is provided to the management system, but message overload and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance data completenessVSAvoidnumber of messages
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual threshold crossing notifications (SET and CLEAR traps) into a single consolidated FLAP trap message. Instead of sending separate messages for each threshold crossing event, the system aggregates these events and reports them together in one message, reducing the total number of messages while preserving performance data completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a monitoring time period during which threshold crossing events are collected and aggregated. Rather than immediately sending notifications for each crossing, the system periodically consolidates events that occur within the same time period, transforming continuous individual notifications into periodic batch reports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Loss of information

If individual SET and CLEAR traps are sent for each threshold crossing, then detailed performance information is provided, but management system resource usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance information detailVSAvoidmanagement system resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual trap messages into a single consolidated FLAP trap, reducing the processing burden on the management system. By combining multiple events into one message, the system reduces the number of processing cycles, memory allocations, and resource operations required while maintaining detailed performance information within the consolidated message.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of information

If threshold flapping detection is implemented, then network stability visibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork stability visibilityVSAvoidmonitoring mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its monitoring behavior based on threshold crossing events. When performance parameters cross thresholds, the system activates enhanced monitoring to detect flapping conditions, and transitions from standard monitoring to periodic consolidation mode. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to provide detailed visibility only when needed, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10541889B1Optimization mechanism for threshold notifications in service OAM for performance monitoring
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
  • US10541889B1 patent drawing
  • US10541889B1 patent drawing
  • US10541889B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example device includes a network interface and a control unit that provides an execution environment for network performance monitoring module. The network performance monitoring monitors performance of a network between the network device and a different network device, determines, based on the monitoring, that the performance does not satisfy a performance metric, in response to the determination, performs enhanced network performance monitoring for a duration of time, and determines, based on the enhance network performance monitoring, a number of times the performance of the network transitioned between not satisfying the performance metric and satisfying the performance metric during the duration of time. The network interface transmits, to an element management system, information about the performance of the network, the information including at least the number of times the performance of the network transitioned between not satisfying and satisfying the performance metric during the duration of time.