Throttle Assembly With Bidirectional Regen Braking Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing regenerative braking systems in vehicles lack rider control and feedback, leading to unpleasant driving experiences, vehicle instability, and safety issues due to pre-programmed braking, which can cause confusion and harshness feelings, especially in varying driving conditions.

Innovation Solution

A throttle assembly with user-controlled regenerative braking modes, allowing riders to adjust braking intensity through clockwise and anticlockwise rotations, featuring a bidirectional torsional spring and slot mechanism for intuitive control, applicable to both cable and sensor-based variants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If pre-programmed regenerative braking is implemented, then energy recovery is achieved, but rider control and feedback are lost leading to vehicle instability and safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidrider control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the rider can sense the regenerative braking force through the throttle grip and provide intuitive feedback by rotating the throttle in clockwise or anticlockwise directions. This allows the rider to control the intensity of regenerative braking while maintaining energy recovery, thus resolving the contradiction between energy recovery and rider control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the regenerative braking intensity based on rider input through throttle rotation direction and magnitude. The braking force is not fixed but varies according to rider commands, enabling both energy recovery and adaptive rider control across different driving conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If pre-programmed regenerative braking is used, then energy recovery occurs, but rider feedback is absent causing confusion and harshness feelings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidrider feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dual feedback system: mechanical feedback through the torsional spring that provides tactile sensation to the rider, and electronic feedback through the controller that adjusts regenerative braking based on throttle position. This ensures the rider receives continuous information about system state and maintains intuitive control, preventing confusion and harshness while preserving energy recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional braking systems are used, then kinetic energy is converted to heat, but energy is wasted as heat dissipated to atmosphere

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking system simplicityVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical conventional braking system with an electro-mechanical regenerative braking system. The mechanical brake is supplemented by an electrical braking mechanism that converts kinetic energy to electrical energy through the motor acting as a generator, thereby reducing energy waste while maintaining braking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of kinetic energy loss during braking into a beneficial outcome by using the motor to generate electrical energy from the vehicle's momentum. This transforms wasted energy into stored electrical energy that can be used later, maintaining braking effectiveness while eliminating energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances rider control and stability by providing intuitive regenerative braking, reducing fatigue and improving drive feel, while minimizing constructional modifications for easy retrofitting.

Implementation Method 1

featuring a bidirectional torsional spring and slot mechanism for intuitive control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsional spring: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4171987B1A motorized vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 TVS MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP4171987B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4171987B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4171987B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a throttle assembly (202) of a motorized vehicle (100) comprising a slot (502), a torsional spring (503) and a stopper ring (504), wherein the stopper (504a) of the stopper ring (504) is relieved in a second region (Y). A throttle assembly (202) of a vehicle (100) is capable of being rotated in both clockwise and anti-clock wise direction to achieve one or more three throttle assembly states, viz, a first state (A), or a state (B), and a third state (C). Resultant to which a user-controlled regenerative mode is achieved upon rotating the throttle assembly (202) in a clockwise direction when viewed from the outward end (202a), from the first state (A) to the third state (C).