Throttle Valve IMC Control for Accurate Intake Manifold Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for intake manifold pressure regulation at the throttle valve face challenges such as reduced sensitivity to throttle valve movements, leading to inaccurate pressure control, increased noise amplification, and potential degradation of the throttle valve component, especially in the pressure equalization zone, which affects driving behavior and fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an Internal Model Control (IMC) principle to continuously control the throttle valve position across the entire operating range, using a model-based feedforward control system to calculate and adjust the throttle valve area based on target intake manifold pressure, while filtering noise and considering physical actuator limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional control systems are used for intake manifold pressure regulation at the throttle valve, then the system structure is simple, but the control accuracy is reduced due to reduced sensitivity to throttle valve movements in the pressure equalization zone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from direct throttle valve position control to intake manifold pressure control. By using pressure feedback and adjusting the throttle valve based on pressure deviations rather than position commands, the system maintains high control accuracy even in the pressure equalization zone where direct position control becomes insensitive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where the actual intake manifold pressure is continuously measured and compared with the target pressure. The control unit adjusts the throttle valve position based on the pressure deviation, creating a closed-loop system that maintains accuracy regardless of the operating zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If conventional control systems regulate intake manifold pressure, then the control loop is simple, but noise amplification increases leading to degraded throttle valve component

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrottle valve component durabilityVSAvoidnoise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control mechanism allows the system to respond to actual pressure conditions rather than issuing aggressive position commands. This results in smoother throttle valve adjustments that reduce mechanical stress and noise, extending component life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By controlling based on pressure feedback rather than position commands, the system naturally produces smoother actuator movements. The pressure-based control parameter filtering reduces high-frequency noise that would otherwise cause rapid, damaging throttle valve fluctuations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional control systems are used, then the control algorithm is simple, but steady-state accuracy of intake manifold pressure is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteady-state accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous feedback of actual intake manifold pressure to the control unit enables the system to detect and correct steady-state pressure deviations. The control algorithm integrates pressure error over time, ensuring that even small steady-state errors are eliminated through persistent small adjustments to the throttle valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control algorithm uses pressure-based feedback parameters rather than position-based parameters. This allows the system to maintain accurate steady-state pressure control by continuously adjusting the throttle valve based on actual pressure measurements, achieving high precision without overly complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Use of energy by moving object

If conventional control systems regulate pressure, then the response is fast, but fuel consumption increases due to inaccurate fresh air charge control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidfresh air charge accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure feedback control ensures that the actual fresh air charge matches the target charge by continuously monitoring intake manifold pressure. This accuracy prevents both over-fueling (wasting fuel) and under-fueling (reducing power), optimizing fuel consumption while maintaining required performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By using pressure as the controlled parameter rather than throttle position, the system achieves more accurate air charge control. This leads to better stoichiometry control and optimized fuel injection timing, reducing fuel consumption while maintaining the required fresh air charge in the cylinder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3940217B1Method for adjusting a throttle valve, engine control device and vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • EP3940217B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3940217B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3940217B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method for adjusting a throttle valve, comprising: controlling a throttle valve position throughout the entire operating range of an internal combustion engine, wherein the control is based on an Internal Model Control (IMC) principle.