Thrust Reverser Actuation With Bi-Directional Pump Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thrust reverser actuation systems for jet propulsion engines are inefficient due to high power requirements, complex synchronization systems, and excessive weight, leading to power wastage and increased construction costs.

Innovation Solution

A thrust reverser actuation system utilizing bi-directional electrically-driven pumps to power hydraulically-driven actuators, eliminating the need for high-pressure hydraulic circuits and complex synchronization systems, and simplifying control mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional hydraulic systems are used to power thrust reverser actuators, then sufficient actuation power is provided, but significant power wastage occurs due to high pressure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation powerVSAvoidpower wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the hydraulic power supply into separate segments: the aircraft's main hydraulic system and individual pump units for each actuator. Each actuator has its own pump that draws from a common low-pressure reservoir, eliminating the need to use the high-pressure main hydraulic system for thrust reverser actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A common hydraulic reservoir serves as an intermediary between the aircraft's hydraulic system and the individual actuator pumps. This reservoir stores hydraulic fluid at low pressure, and the pumps draw from it to provide the necessary high pressure locally at each actuator, avoiding direct connection to the high-pressure main system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If conventional hydraulic systems operate at high pressure, then sufficient power is available, but components must be constructed to handle higher pressures leading to weight gains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic powerVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic power delivery is segmented into distributed pump units, each serving an individual actuator. This allows each component to be sized for the specific power requirements of its actuator rather than being designed for the full system's maximum power demand, reducing overall component size and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

High pressure is generated locally at each actuator by its own pump unit, rather than distributing high pressure throughout the entire system. This allows components to be optimized for local requirements, using smaller, lighter components that only need to handle the pressure and flow needed for their specific actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If mechanical synchronization systems are used to coordinate actuators, then actuator synchronization is achieved, but weight is added to the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator synchronizationVSAvoidsynchronization system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical synchronization linkages with an electronic control system. A control unit receives signals and independently controls each pump unit's operation, eliminating the need for mechanical connections between actuators while maintaining synchronization through electronic coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An electronic control unit serves as an intermediary between the pilot's input and the individual actuator pumps. This control unit coordinates the operation of multiple pumps independently, achieving synchronization through electronic signaling rather than mechanical linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If mechanical synchronization systems are used, then actuator coordination is ensured, but complex linkages are required between actuators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator coordinationVSAvoidsynchronization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Complex mechanical linkages between actuators are replaced with an electronic control system. The control unit independently manages each pump unit through electronic signals, eliminating the need for physical synchronization mechanisms while maintaining coordinated actuator operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The synchronization function is segmented and distributed to individual electronic control units that manage each pump independently. This modular electronic approach replaces the monolithic mechanical synchronization system, reducing complexity while maintaining coordination through independent but synchronized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Ease of manufacture

If electronic systems with electrical motors are used, then no hydraulic fluid is required, but complex controls are needed to prevent actuator damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses hydraulics at the actuator level through pump units that convert electrical energy to hydraulic pressure locally. This hybrid approach combines the simplicity of electrical control with the effectiveness of hydraulic actuation, avoiding the need for complex electronic controls while eliminating the need for the aircraft's main hydraulic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that simplifies the interface between electrical control signals and hydraulic actuation. It manages the operation of multiple independent pump units through straightforward electronic control, avoiding the need for complex control algorithms while maintaining precise actuator coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

6Power

If conventional hydraulic systems are used, then actuation power is sufficient, but construction costs increase due to heavy-duty components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation powerVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Each actuator system is designed with local quality in mind, using components sized and rated for the specific power requirements of that actuator rather than the maximum system requirements. This allows for more economical component selection and reduces overall construction costs while maintaining sufficient actuation power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into independent actuator-pump units, each with components sized for its specific requirements. This modular approach allows for more efficient use of materials and reduces the need for over-engineered heavy-duty components throughout the entire system, lowering construction costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces weight, power consumption, and complexity, while preventing actuator damage from synchronization issues, and enhances operational efficiency by using bi-directional pumps to control the direction of actuation.

Implementation Method 1

a bi-directional electrically-driven pump configured to pump hydraulic fluid through the hydraulic circuit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPump: Pump

Data Source

PatentUS11536223B2Thrust reverser actuation system
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 GOODRICH ACTUATION SYST
  • US11536223B2 patent drawing
  • US11536223B2 patent drawing
  • US11536223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thrust reverser actuation system for a jet propulsion engine for a vehicle, the thrust reverser actuation system comprising: a plurality of hydraulically-driven thrust reverser actuators for actuating one or more thrust reverser components of the jet propulsion engine, each actuator comprising: a hydraulic circuit; and a bi-directional electrically-driven pump configured to pump hydraulic fluid through the hydraulic circuit, wherein the hydraulic circuit and the pump are configured such that the direction of the pump dictates the direction of the actuation of the actuator.