Thrust Reverser Sleeve Translation and Blocker Door Nesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thrust reverser systems in aircraft experience inefficiencies and noise reduction challenges due to the stowed position of blocker doors interfacing with the bypass duct, leading to losses and limited acoustic treatment areas, and fixed cascades restricting sleeve length.

Innovation Solution

A thrust reverser system where the sleeve and cascades translate via a common actuator, with a blocker door contained within the sleeve in the stowed state, using a track and link mechanism with trapping devices and a hinge for controlled deployment, allowing optimized reverse thrust performance and increased acoustic treatment area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the blocker door is in the stowed position interfacing with the bypass duct, then the thrust reverser is compact during cruise, but this creates steps and gaps that cause flow losses and reduce acoustic treatment area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebypass flow lossesVSAvoidblocker door positioning mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocker door is nested within the sleeve structure during stowed configuration, eliminating the need for it to interface with the bypass duct. This nesting approach removes the harmful steps and gaps while maintaining system compactness, as the blocker door becomes part of the internal sleeve assembly rather than an external component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocker door is extracted from the bypass duct interface and repositioned within the sleeve. This extraction eliminates the source of flow losses (steps and gaps at the bypass duct interface) while the blocker door retains its function within the new location, improving acoustic treatment area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Length of moving object

If the cascades are fixed and do not translate, then the structure is simpler, but this restricts the sleeve length that can be used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesleeve lengthVSAvoidcascade actuation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cascade translation mechanism is merged with the sleeve actuation system through a common actuator. This allows both components to move together as a coordinated unit, enabling longer sleeve designs without requiring separate, complex actuation systems for the cascades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The common actuator serves multiple functions: it actuates the sleeve and simultaneously drives the cascade translation. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while enabling increased sleeve length, as one actuator performs what would traditionally require multiple independent mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Area of stationary object

If the blocker door is contained within the sleeve cavity when stowed, then acoustic treatment area is increased, but the deployment control mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic treatment areaVSAvoidtrack and link mechanism with trapping devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocker door transitions from a static nested position to a dynamic deployed position through the track and link mechanism. This dynamic capability allows the blocker door to move between containing (acoustic treatment) and blocking (reverse thrust) positions, with trapping devices providing automated position control that manages the complexity of the movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The trapping devices are pre-positioned within the track to automatically capture and hold the blocker door at specific positions. This preliminary positioning of the trapping mechanisms simplifies the overall control system by providing passive position holding rather than requiring active control throughout the entire deployment range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If the sleeve and cascades translate via a common actuator, then system complexity is reduced, but precise independent control of each component is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation systemVSAvoidindependent component control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The common actuator employs an asymmetric mechanical linkage system where different portions of the actuator's range of motion produce different effects: initial movement translates the sleeve, while subsequent movement translates the cascades. This asymmetric design allows one actuator to provide effectively independent control of both components through its sequential action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3181882B1Translating cascade thrust reverser with control of blocker door
Publication Date: 2020.04.01 ROHR INC
  • EP3181882B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3181882B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3181882B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

System (202) of a thrust reverser of an aircraft, comprising: a set of cascades (270) incorporating a track (280;380), the track (280;380) including a first track end (380b) and a second track end (380c), a blocker door (266), and a link (274;374) including a first link end (274a) coupled to the track (280;380) and a second link end (274b) coupled to the blocker door (266), where the cascades (270) are configured to translate between a stowed position and a deployed position to cause the first link end (274a) to traverse the track (280;380).