Thruster Mounting Structure With Rotational Joints
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Satellites and spacecraft propelled by chemical rocket systems are inefficient in terms of propellant use, leaving limited mass for payloads, while electric propulsion systems offer high efficiency but low thrust, making them unsuitable for immediate thrust applications.
Innovation Solution
A thruster mounting structure with multiple rotational joints allows for flexible orientation and positioning of electric thrusters, enabling efficient thruster vectoring for station keeping and orbit raising maneuvers, allowing for independent control of orbit parameters like altitude, inclination, and eccentricity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If electric propulsion systems are used, then propellant efficiency and specific impulse are improved, but thrust magnitude deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The thruster mounting structure employs multiple rotational joints that enable dynamic repositioning of the thruster assembly, allowing the system to adapt its orientation and position during operation to optimize performance despite low thrust magnitude
Solution Approach 2:
The invention adds spatial dimensions through multiple rotational joints, enabling the thruster to operate in three-dimensional space with independent control of orientation angles, thereby compensating for low thrust through optimized vectoring in multiple directions
2Force
If chemical rocket propulsion systems are used, then thrust magnitude is improved, but propellant efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The thruster mounting structure with multiple rotational joints provides multi-functionality, enabling the same electric thruster assembly to perform various maneuvers (station keeping, orbit raising, attitude control) that traditionally required different propulsion systems, thereby achieving high propellant efficiency across diverse operational requirements
3Device complexity
If fixed thruster mounting is used, then device complexity is reduced, but mission adaptability deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The mounting structure transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic one with multiple rotational joints, each capable of independent rotation to reposition the thruster assembly in three-dimensional space, enabling adaptation to various mission requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The thruster mounting structure is segmented into multiple independently controllable rotational joints, allowing each joint to be controlled separately to achieve complex positioning and orientation maneuvers required for different mission phases
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods are described herein for mounting a thruster onto a vehicle. A thruster mounting structure may comprise a first, second, and third rotational joint, a boom, and thruster pallet, and a thruster attached to the thruster pallet. The first rotational joint may be attached to the vehicle and configured to rotate in a first axis. The first rotational joint may be connected to the boom and configured to pivot the boom about the first axis. The boom may be connected to the second rotational joint, which is connected to the third rotational joint and configured to rotate the third rotational joint in the first axis. The third rotational joint may be connected to the thruster pallet and configured to pivot the thruster pallet in a second axis that is perpendicular to the first axis.


