Thyristor Switching for Railway Phase Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automatic split phase crossing technologies for electrified railways face issues with power interruptions and transient electrical processes, leading to potential component damage and performance degradation, especially in high-speed trains.

Innovation Solution

An automatic split phase crossing system utilizing normally-closed thyristor switches, load switches, current and voltage transformers, and high-voltage resistors, which are controlled by a central unit to manage power supply arms and neutral sections, ensuring instantaneous switching during zero-crossing points to maintain uninterrupted power supply and suppress transient processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If ground-switch automatic split phase crossing is used, then power interruption time is reduced to 200ms-400ms, but switching transient processes cause over-voltage or over-current that may damage components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower interruption timeVSAvoidover-voltage and over-current during switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of train position using sensors and control units before the actual switching operation. The control unit receives position information and prepares the switching sequence in advance, ensuring that switching occurs at the optimal moment when train current draw is minimal, thereby reducing transient over-voltage and over-current effects while maintaining fast switching time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously monitors train position, switching state, and electrical parameters. Based on this feedback, the control unit dynamically adjusts the switching timing and sequence, optimizing the switching moment to avoid transient electrical disturbances while maintaining the fast switching performance needed to minimize power interruption time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If switching action is performed without restriction on switching time point, then device complexity is reduced, but transient processes easily cause over-voltage or over-current during operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching control complexityVSAvoidover-voltage and over-current during switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the train's own operational characteristics (current draw patterns, position information) to automatically determine the optimal switching moment. The control unit processes position signals from sensors and autonomously decides when to execute switching, eliminating the need for complex external control mechanisms while ensuring switching occurs at safe moments that minimize transient electrical disturbances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If on-board automatic split phase crossing is used, then driver manual operation is eliminated, but train has long power interruption time and large speed loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic split phase crossingVSAvoidpower interruption time and speed loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical ground switches with electronic thyristor-based switching devices controlled by a microprocessor unit. This electronic switching system operates much faster than mechanical switches, reducing power interruption time from seconds to milliseconds, while the automated control eliminates driver response delays and ensures optimal switching timing to minimize speed loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If ground-switch automatic split phase crossing is used, then power supply dead zones are eliminated, but switching time of 200ms-400ms still affects high-speed train performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelimination of power supply dead zonesVSAvoidtrain performance for high-speed trains
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts switching parameters based on real-time train position and electrical load conditions. The control unit modifies switching timing and duration according to the specific operational context, enabling the system to achieve both reliability (no power dead zones) and high productivity (minimal impact on high-speed train performance) by optimizing switching for each specific situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides uninterrupted power supply to trains, reduces interference with the power grid, and prevents over-voltage and over-current issues, enhancing performance and safety by minimizing switching time and transient effects.

Implementation Method 1

the thyristor switch is turned off at a zero-crossing point of the current to complete the instantaneous switching from the first power supply arm to the second power supply arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectZero-crossing switching:

Data Source

PatentEP3492309B1Automatic passing phase-separation system for section post of electrified railway, and control method therefor
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIV
  • EP3492309B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The present invention discloses an automatic split phase crossing system and method for electrified railway section posts. The system comprises: a pantograph identifier for sensing a traveling position and direction of a train; a voltage transformer for detecting a voltage of a first power supply arm; a first resistor and a first thyristor switch, which are connected to two ends of a first sectionalizer in parallel, respectively; a second resistor and a second thyristor switch, which are connected to two ends of a second sectionalizer in parallel, respectively; and a control unit for executing the following operations: in the event that the train travels from the first power supply arm to the first sectionalizer, controlling the first thyristor switch to be turned on during voltage zero-crossing of the first power supply arm; in the event that the train travels from the first power supply arm into the neutral section via the first sectionalizer, controlling the first thyristor switch to be turned off and simultaneously controlling the second thyristor switch to be turned on by means of current zero-crossing of the first thyristor switch for the time being; and in the event that the train travels from the neutral section into the second power supply arm via the second sectionalizer, controlling the second thyristor switch to be turned off.