Tibial Prosthesis Implantation Using Local Bone Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for implanting tibial prostheses do not effectively account for variations in bone density across different portions of the proximal tibia, leading to uneven resistance and potential instability during implantation.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the bone density of specific areas of the tibia using bone density gauges or imaging modalities, allowing for tailored bone removal and selection of appropriate tibial components with corresponding fixation structures to achieve equivalent resistance across all portions of the tibia.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If uniform bone removal is performed across all portions of the proximal tibia, then the implantation process is simplified, but uneven resistance and potential instability occur during implantation due to varying bone density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implantation processVSAvoidstability of prosthesis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating bone removal procedures based on local bone density characteristics. Different portions of the proximal tibia (medial, lateral, anterior, posterior) are assessed individually using bone density gauges, and bone removal is customized for each region to achieve uniform resistance across the implantation interface, thereby resolving the contradiction between procedural simplicity and implantation stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If bone density measurement and customized bone removal are performed for each portion of the tibia, then uniform resistance and stable implantation are achieved, but the complexity of the implantation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of prosthesisVSAvoidcomplexity of implantation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the proximal tibia into distinct portions (medial, lateral, anterior, posterior) for individual bone density assessment and customized bone removal. This segmentation allows systematic management of complexity by treating each region separately with standardized assessment protocols, achieving uniform resistance while organizing the complex procedure into manageable segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If excessive bone removal is performed to ensure fit in denser bone areas, then the prosthesis fits well in high-density regions, but bone loss increases and potential instability occurs in lower density areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit of prosthesisVSAvoidbone loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prevents excessive bone loss by applying local quality principles - each portion of the tibia receives bone removal tailored to its specific density characteristics. Bone density gauges guide the extent of bone removal in each region, ensuring adequate fit in high-density areas without over-removal that would compromise low-density areas, thereby optimizing prosthesis fit while minimizing total bone loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9931218B2Method of implanting a knee prosthesis based on bone density
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 BIOMET MFG LLC
  • US9931218B2 patent drawing
  • US9931218B2 patent drawing
  • US9931218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of implanting a prosthesis based on bone density of a bone is provided. A first bone density of the bone may be determined at a first portion of the bone. A second bone density of the bone may be determined at a second portion of the bone. A first desired amount of bone removal may be determined at the first portion of the bone based on the first bone density. A second desired amount of bone removal may be determined at the second portion of the bone based on the second bone density. The desired amounts of bone may be removed from the first and second portions of the bone. A prosthesis may be selected and implanted.