Tiered Aggregation for Network Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As the number of locations for network interaction fraud detection increases, the processing location faces a bottleneck in handling the aggregated information, impeding the scalability of detection systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tiered aggregation system where network interaction information is processed and aggregated across multiple locations, including local, organizational, segment, country, and centralized aggregators, with rules-based determinations for sharing metadata and using models to assess confidence levels for fraud detection, allowing for efficient data transfer and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If information from multiple locations is aggregated at a single processing location, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing bottleneck increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized processing function into distributed processing units located at multiple geographic locations. Each processing unit independently processes information from local sensors and makes local detection decisions, eliminating the single processing bottleneck while maintaining aggregated detection capability through distributed collaboration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the processing architecture, organizing processing units across multiple levels (local, regional, national). This multi-level hierarchy allows information to be processed at appropriate granularities, distributing the processing load across vertical levels while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of monitoring locations increases, then fraud detection coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal processing units that can operate independently or in coordination with other units. Each processing unit is designed to perform the same core detection functions locally, allowing the system to scale by simply adding more identical units rather than designing increasingly complex centralized processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a nested hierarchical structure where local processing units are contained within regional aggregates, which are in turn contained within national systems. This nesting allows complex national-level detection to be built from simpler regional and local components, reducing overall system complexity through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS10193908B2Data transfer for network interaction fraudulence detection
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 COMSCORE INC
  • US10193908B2 patent drawing
  • US10193908B2 patent drawing
  • US10193908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for analyzing network interaction data is disclosed. Initially, network interaction data is received from a network over time. A predetermined model comprising predetermined values associated with network interaction parameters is also received. The received network interaction data is processed to determine the network interaction parameters and information regarding the network interaction data. A score for the network interaction data is calculated based on the predetermined model and the determined network interaction parameters. The score is compared to a threshold. The information regarding the network interaction data is then forwarded based on the comparison of the score to the threshold.