Tiered Archive Storage for Check Image Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial institutions face significant storage space challenges due to the large volume of image file records of deposited checks and negotiable instruments, necessitating a solution to reduce storage requirements while adhering to regulatory retention periods.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tiered archive system where data is stored across multiple layers with varying image quality and file formats, allowing for scheduled transfers between tiers, thereby reducing storage footprint by decreasing image resolution and file size over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If image file records are maintained at high quality for regulatory compliance, then legal requirements are met, but storage space requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with legal retention requirementsVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The archive is divided into multiple tiers with different image quality levels. Recently accessed checks are stored in higher quality tiers, while older checks are moved to lower quality tiers, segmenting the storage requirements by access patterns and regulatory needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the image quality parameter (resolution) based on the tier and age of the check image. High-resolution images are maintained for recent checks, while older checks are stored at progressively lower resolutions, allowing compliance while reducing overall storage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If all check images are stored at maximum resolution, then image quality is preserved, but storage costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the archive (tiers) have different image quality levels. The most recently archived checks maintain high image quality, while older checks are stored at lower quality levels, applying local quality variations based on archival age and access likelihood

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single-tier archive structure is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but storage efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearchive structureVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The archive is segmented into multiple tiers with different characteristics (image quality, access frequency, storage capacity). This segmentation allows the system to optimize storage efficiency by placing different types of data in appropriately configured tiers, improving overall productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9087062B2Tiered-archive maintenance
Publication Date: 2015.07.21 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9087062B2 patent drawing
  • US9087062B2 patent drawing
  • US9087062B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention relate to systems, computer-implemented methods, and computer program products for managing a tiered archive. In some embodiments, a method is provided that includes: (a) providing an archive having two or more tiers for storing data, where each of the two or more tiers is assigned an image quality value, and wherein the image quality value assigned to each of the two or more tiers of the archive is different; (b) managing the archive based on a schedule for managing the data or on one or more rules, wherein managing the archive comprises: (1) storing data in a first of the two or more tiers based on the image quality value assigned to the first tier; and (2) storing data in a second of the two or more tiers based on the schedule and the image quality value assigned to the second tier.