Multi-Tier Aircraft Flight Itinerary Alerting System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for monitoring aircraft flights and sending alert messages when flights exceed expected arrival times are limited in their ability to communicate effectively with pilots and emergency response personnel, often resulting in overlooked aircraft or false alarms due to inadequate coordination and reporting.

Innovation Solution

A flight itinerary alerting system that includes a central monitoring system with multiple tiers of contact data and alert conditions, using a communication interface to send alert messages via various channels (SMS, email, phone) to ensure timely and redundant notification of potential issues, minimizing false alarms and ensuring responsible action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single-tier alerting system is used to notify contact persons about overdue flights, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the reliability of alert delivery deteriorates due to potential false alarms and overlooked aircraft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert delivery reliabilityVSAvoidalerting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alerting system is segmented into multiple tiers (first tier, second tier, third tier) where each tier represents a different level of alert severity and contact priority. This segmentation allows the system to differentiate between routine delays and genuine emergencies, improving reliability by ensuring that alerts are escalated appropriately through the hierarchy until acknowledged or resolved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to alerting by implementing time-based escalation rules. If no acknowledgment is received within specified timeframes (e.g., 30 minutes for first tier, 60 minutes for second tier), the alert automatically progresses to the next tier. This time-based dimension ensures persistent monitoring and notification without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple communication channels are implemented for alert delivery, then the completeness of notification is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification completenessVSAvoidcommunication interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication interface is designed with multi-functionality to support multiple communication channels (SMS, email, voice calls) through a unified architecture. This universal interface handles different notification methods interchangeably, improving notification completeness by ensuring alerts reach contact persons through their preferred or available channel while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated systems for each communication method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated alert escalation is implemented across multiple tiers, then the responsiveness to overdue flights is improved, but the operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse efficiencyVSAvoidalert processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring escalation rules, contact hierarchies, and time thresholds before alerts are generated. When an aircraft becomes overdue, the system automatically executes the predetermined escalation sequence without requiring real-time human decision-making about whom to contact or when to escalate, thereby improving response efficiency while keeping operational complexity manageable through automation of routine decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The alert processing routine incorporates feedback mechanisms where each tier's acknowledgment status feeds into the decision logic for escalating to the next tier. If a contact person acknowledges or resolves the alert at any tier, the feedback stops further escalation. This feedback loop ensures efficient automated response while maintaining simplicity by using straightforward conditional logic based on acknowledgment status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9959770B2Aircraft flight itinerary alerting system
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 AIRSUITE INC
  • US9959770B2 patent drawing
  • US9959770B2 patent drawing
  • US9959770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flight itinerary alerting system for monitoring a flight itinerary includes a monitoring system storing flight itinerary data like pilot contact data, first tier contact data, and second tier contact data. An alert routine executable on the monitoring system i) determines first or second tier alert conditions if no deactivation message is received upon expiry of a respective first or second duration following the expected arrival time, and ii) send an alert message through a communication network to a computer device of a corresponding first or second tier contact person upon determination of the respective alert condition. The multiple tiers of contact data with respective alerting criteria allows quick determination if search and rescue should be contacted with inherent redundancy, thus preventing overdue aircraft from being overlooked, while also minimizing false alarms in reporting overdue aircraft to search and rescue which might reasonably be accounted for by responsible persons.