Multi-Level Geolocation Checks for Mobile Gambling Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile gaming systems struggle to accurately determine the location of devices accessing gaming services, particularly when using IP addresses, leading to potential unauthorized access from unauthorized locations.

Innovation Solution

A multi-level location determination system that utilizes trusted IP-based locations, high confidence IP-based locations, and secondary location verification methods such as geofencing and GPS to ensure accurate location determination before allowing access to gaming services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If IP address-based location determination is used for mobile gaming access, then access convenience is improved, but location accuracy deteriorates leading to potential unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess convenienceVSAvoidlocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The location verification process is segmented into multiple levels: first checking trusted IP addresses, then high-confidence IP addresses with confidence scoring, and finally fallback to device-based location services. This segmentation allows the system to use convenient IP-based methods when reliable, while escalating to more accurate methods only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A confidence scoring mechanism acts as an intermediary between IP address matching and location verification. The system assigns confidence levels to IP address matches and uses this intermediate metric to determine whether additional verification is needed, bridging the gap between convenient IP-based access and accurate location determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple location verification methods are implemented, then location accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system dynamically adjusts its complexity based on the situation. It starts with simple IP address checking and only escalates to more complex verification methods (confidence scoring, secondary location services) when the initial methods are insufficient. This dynamic approach maintains accuracy while minimizing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary checks using simple IP address matching before invoking more complex verification methods. By establishing a hierarchy of verification steps and executing them in order, the system prepares and executes location verification efficiently, only engaging complex methods when absolutely necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If IP address trust levels are differentiated, then access security is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Different levels of IP address trustworthiness are assigned different verification requirements. Trusted IP addresses receive immediate access with minimal verification, while untrusted IP addresses undergo more rigorous checking. This local quality approach applies different security measures to different situations, improving security for untrusted sources without penalizing trusted ones with unnecessary processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12548404B2Multi-level device verification for mobile gambling applications
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 INTERACTIVE GAMES
  • US12548404B2 patent drawing
  • US12548404B2 patent drawing
  • US12548404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for multi-level device verification for mobile gambling applications are described. For example, when an application executing on a smartphone attempts to access a gambling activity of the gambling service, the location of the smartphone is attempted to be determined based on GPS data. If the GPS data is not determinable, the location of the smartphone may be determined using another technique, such as triangulation. Based on the determined location, the application receives an indication that the smartphone is in a U.S. state where gambling is allowed, and the application is enabled to access the gambling service to engage in the gambling activity.