Multi-tier Sensor Network for Decentralized Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security monitoring and warning systems rely heavily on central data analysis and human intervention, which limits their ability to process large amounts of data efficiently and respond quickly to threats, especially in scenarios like tsunami or tornado warnings.

Innovation Solution

A multi-tier network system is implemented, where sensors are spatially distributed across different tiers, each performing specific data collection and processing tasks, with communication links based on geographic and non-geographic attributes, allowing for decentralized data processing and response generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a central hub is used for data analysis, then data processing can be simplified, but the processing speed and response time are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing structureVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized data processing system into multiple distributed sensor nodes, each capable of independent data processing and analysis. This segmentation allows parallel processing of sensor data across numerous nodes simultaneously, dramatically increasing response speed while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional centralized processing model to a multi-dimensional distributed network architecture. By adding spatial distribution as a new dimension, the system processes data across multiple locations and processing levels concurrently, achieving faster response times without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If human intervention is used for threat analysis, then decision accuracy can be improved, but the response time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary automated processing and filtering of sensor data at distributed nodes before human review. This preliminary action prepares and pre-analyzes data in advance, so when human operators do review threats, the data is already organized and prioritized, maintaining high decision accuracy while reducing the time humans need to spend on analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated processing layer between sensor data collection and human decision-making. This intermediary layer performs initial threat assessment, data filtering, and prioritization, acting as a mediator that handles routine processing automatically while presenting only significant threats to human operators, thus reducing response time without sacrificing decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a centralized system is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to process large amounts of data is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem architectureVSAvoiddata processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing function across multiple distributed sensor nodes, with each node handling its own data collection and initial processing. This segmentation enables the system to process large volumes of data in parallel across numerous nodes, dramatically increasing overall data processing capacity while maintaining simple modular architecture at each node level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of data collection, initial processing, and communication into integrated sensor nodes. By combining these functions at the distributed node level, the system achieves high data processing capacity through parallel operations while maintaining architectural simplicity through functional integration at each node, avoiding the complexity of separate centralized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8274377B2Information collecting and decision making via tiered information network systems
Publication Date: 2012.09.25 DECISION SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL CORP
  • US8274377B2 patent drawing
  • US8274377B2 patent drawing
  • US8274377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques, apparatus and systems for information collecting and decision making based on one or more tiered networks of sensors and communication nodes for security monitoring and warning, disaster warning, counter-terrorism, and other applications associated with information collecting and decision making. In implementations, the one or more tier networks in the plurality of different tier networks include network nodes at roadway intersections; the sensors include automatic license plate recognition sensors to obtain data on vehicle license plates; and the response produced by the processing mechanism includes controlling traffic controllers to alter traffic routes at one or more locations. In other implementations, each command center in a tier network comprises a database to store data, a situation awareness module to provide event detection, event forecasting, assessment and response, an analytic module to analyze data characteristics, and a communication module to provide communications with adjacent subordinate and superordinate tier networks.