Tiered Data Storage Using Dynamic Relevancy Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data management systems struggle to efficiently manage storage of data in a set of storage tiers, leading to suboptimal access times for relevant information due to limited resources and varying performance levels across storage tiers.

Innovation Solution

A data management system that prioritizes storage based on the relevancy of data to an individual by analyzing collected data, identifying relevant topics, and dynamically updating relevancy rankings to store more relevant data in higher performing tiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If data is stored in higher performing storage tiers, then data access speed is improved, but storage resource utilization deteriorates due to limited capacity in high-performance tiers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access speedVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is divided into multiple storage tiers with different performance characteristics (e.g., high-performance tier, standard tier, low-performance tier). Data is segmented and placed in appropriate tiers based on relevancy rankings, allowing the system to optimize access speed for important data while using lower-performance storage for less critical data, thus resolving the contradiction between speed and storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different storage tiers provide different quality levels of performance. High-performance storage is allocated locally to store highly relevant data that requires fast access, while lower-performance storage is used for less relevant data. This local differentiation of quality allows the system to maximize overall efficiency without wasting high-performance resources on all data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of time

If all data is stored in high-performance storage, then data access time is reduced, but storage resource constraints are violated due to limited high-performance capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access timeVSAvoidhigh-performance storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts data placement across storage tiers based on changing relevancy rankings. As data relevancy changes over time, the system moves data between tiers to maintain optimal access performance. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to minimize access time for currently relevant data while respecting the fixed capacity constraints of high-performance storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the storage location parameter of data based on its relevancy ranking. When relevancy rankings are updated, data is moved between storage tiers to reflect changed requirements. This parameter change approach allows the system to optimize access time for relevant data while maintaining adherence to storage capacity constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If data is prioritized by relevancy ranking, then service quality is improved, but system complexity increases due to dynamic ranking updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor data access patterns, usage statistics, and other metrics to continuously update relevancy rankings. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically adjust data prioritization based on actual usage, improving service quality while managing complexity through automated decision-making rather than manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The data management system performs self-service by automatically analyzing data, determining relevancy rankings, and making placement decisions without external intervention. This self-service capability improves service quality through consistent, data-driven decisions while managing system complexity by embedding the management logic within the system itself rather than requiring external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12488043B2System and method for managing storage of data in a set of storage tiers
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 DELL PROD LP
  • US12488043B2 patent drawing
  • US12488043B2 patent drawing
  • US12488043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing storage of data in a set of storage tiers are disclosed. To manage storage of data, data management system may analyze data to identify topic classifications and topic rankings for the data. Data management system may prioritize storage of data in higher performing storage tiers based on the relevancy of the data for one or more purposes with respect to an individual. To identify relevant data with respect to the individual for which data is being stored, data management system may analyze data, including audio recordings of interactions between the individual and other individuals to identify topics relevant to the individual. Based on the identified topics, data management system may establish a relevancy quantification for the portions of data and use the relevancy quantification to select a storage tier in which to store the portion of the data.