Tiered Support Access Authentication for Technician Consoles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computing support systems face challenges in securely verifying the identity and authorization level of users requesting technical support, as malicious actors can exploit human technicians to bypass security protocols, posing a risk to computing systems and data integrity.

Innovation Solution

A computing support system that programmatically manages support access through a technician console, using multi-factor authentication and support control services to enforce authentication levels and restrict access based on verified identities and authorization, leveraging NFTs and blockchain for enhanced security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multi-factor authentication and programmatic access management are implemented, then security against unauthorized access is improved, but system complexity and authentication time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs authentication challenges and authorization determinations before granting support access. The computing support system issues authentication challenges to the user's computing device, verifies responses, and determines authorization levels in advance, ensuring security measures are in place before any support actions can be performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary authentication and authorization system between the user and the support technician. This intermediary computing support system manages the authentication challenges, verifies responses, determines authorization levels, and enforces access controls, separating the security management function from both the user and technician.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If authentication challenges are issued to verify user identity, then security against malicious callers is improved, but support processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity verificationVSAvoidauthentication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a tiered authentication approach where the level of authentication challenge corresponds to the authorization level required. For lower-risk support scenarios, simpler authentication may suffice, while higher-risk operations trigger more stringent verification processes, avoiding unnecessary authentication overhead for routine tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts authentication parameters based on the determined authorization level. The computing support system selects from multiple levels of authentication based on the support access level required, adapting the verification process to the specific risk and necessity of each support interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If programmatic enforcement of support access limits is implemented, then protection against unauthorized support actions is improved, but ease of operation for technicians deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess controlVSAvoidtechnician operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines authorization levels and enforces access controls without requiring manual intervention from technicians. The computing support system programmatically manages support access based on the verified user identity and authorization level, automatically enabling or disabling specific support functions rather than requiring technician judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If multiple levels of support access are granted based on user authorization, then security against insider threats is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization managementVSAvoidaccess level management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments support access into multiple distinct authorization levels, each with specific permitted actions. The computing support system determines the user's authorization level and accordingly enables or disables specific support functions, creating a segmented access control model where different user roles receive different levels of access based on their authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260025386A1User management system for computing support
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 MSP SOLUTIONS GRP LLC
  • US20260025386A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025386A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025386A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing support system is configured to programmatically manage support access to a computing system via a support technician console across multiple levels of support access. The system receives a request to authenticate a user requesting support for the computing system, issues one or more authentication challenges to the user to authenticate the identity of the user, receives one or more corresponding authentication challenge responses from the user based on the authentication challenge, and verifies a level of authentication based on the authentication challenge response, the level of authentication being selected from multiple levels of authentication. The system also determines a level of support access to the computing system based on the verified level of authentication and the identity of the user and programmatically enforces limits on the support access to the computing system via the support technician console based on the determined level of support access.