Tiered Traction Control for Wheel Slip Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traction vehicles experience reduced productivity and surface quality degradation due to excessive wheel slip in low traction conditions, with existing solutions relying on operator intervention or limited torque control.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle traction control system with a controller that automatically activates a tiered sequence of reactions, including torque redistribution, implement lift/lower, transmission torque modulation, and engine speed modulation, to reduce wheel slip based on predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic traction control system is implemented, then operator workload is reduced and productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle productivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traction control system automatically monitors wheel slip conditions and activates appropriate reactions without operator intervention. The controller continuously receives wheel slip signals and autonomously determines when to activate torque redistribution, implement lift, or transmission torque modulation, allowing the system to serve itself and reduce operator workload while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is divided into distinct functional modules: wheel slip detection subsystem, reaction selection subsystem, and execution subsystem. Each module performs a specific function (detecting slip conditions, selecting appropriate reactions from a predetermined list, and activating the selected reactions), which manages overall system complexity through functional segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple reaction options are provided for wheel slip, then adaptability to different conditions is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to operator decision complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction selection flexibilityVSAvoidoperator control simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors wheel slip conditions and receives feedback from wheel speed sensors. Based on this real-time feedback, the system automatically selects from a predetermined list of reactions (torque redistribution, implement lift, transmission torque modulation) and activates the most appropriate response, providing adaptability without requiring operator analysis or decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously evaluates wheel slip conditions and independently selects and activates appropriate reactions from the predetermined list. The controller determines when each reaction type should be activated based on current operating conditions, eliminating the need for operators to manually select from multiple reaction options while maintaining full adaptability to varying traction conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If torque is limited to electric drive motor, then wheel slip is reduced, but power transmission efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel slip controlVSAvoidpower transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts torque distribution based on real-time wheel slip conditions. Rather than continuously limiting torque, the controller activates torque redistribution only when wheel slip is detected, and modulates the degree of torque redistribution based on slip severity. This dynamic approach maintains power transmission efficiency during normal operation while providing reliable wheel slip control when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (torque distribution ratios, transmission torque levels) based on detected wheel slip conditions. When slip is detected, the controller modifies torque parameters to redistribute power away from slipping wheels; when no slip is present, parameters return to normal operating values, maintaining efficiency. This conditional parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between slip control and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10112615B2System and method of reacting to wheel slip in a traction vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 DEERE & CO
  • US10112615B2 patent drawing
  • US10112615B2 patent drawing
  • US10112615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle traction control system for a vehicle having a prime mover, at least one wheel for providing tractive effort on a support surface and being capable of slipping, and a transmission having an input side operably coupled to the prime mover and an output side operably coupled to the at least one wheel. The traction control system includes a controller operable to react to wheel slip by automatically activating a plurality of reactions for reducing wheel slip, wherein the plurality of reactions are tiered such that the controller activates each reaction sequentially in a predetermined order.