Tile Saw Double Movement Assembly for Large Workpieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tile or masonry saw assemblies face limitations in cutting larger workpieces due to size constraints, which restrict the size of the saw and workpiece that can be supported, especially when portability is required.

Innovation Solution

A saw assembly with a movement assembly that allows the saw and workpiece support to move in opposite directions at a selected ratio, such as 2:1, enabling increased relative movement and supporting larger workpieces on a smaller area, while also incorporating a water collection system for efficient wet cutting operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the size of the saw assembly is limited to maintain portability, then the portability is improved, but the size of the workpiece that can be cut is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidworkpiece size capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic system where the workpiece support and saw can move independently relative to each other along the frame. This dynamic configuration allows the compact saw assembly to effectively process larger workpieces by adjusting positions during cutting operations, resolving the contradiction between maintaining portability and enabling larger workpiece cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The saw assembly is segmented into independently movable components: the workpiece support and the saw can move separately along the frame. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for portability while their coordinated movement enables processing of larger workpieces, effectively resolving the size limitation contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If the table size is increased to support larger workpieces, then the workpiece size capability is improved, but the portability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetable sizeVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of a fixed large table, the patent uses a dynamic system where a compact workpiece support can move along the frame to accommodate larger workpieces. This dynamic approach provides the necessary working area for large workpieces without requiring a permanently large table structure, thus maintaining portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a static two-dimensional table surface to a three-dimensional space-utilizing system where the workpiece support moves along the frame. This dimensional change allows larger workpieces to be processed without increasing the footprint or weight of the base assembly, preserving portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a movement assembly enabling double movement is added, then the capability to cut larger workpieces is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece size capabilityVSAvoidmovement assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movement assembly serves multiple functions: it enables independent movement of the workpiece support, independent movement of the saw, and coordinated operation for cutting. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanisms, thereby managing complexity while achieving enhanced workpiece size capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the movement mechanisms for the workpiece support and saw into a unified movement assembly that operates along the same frame. This merging of functions reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate independent mechanisms, while still enabling the double movement capability for larger workpieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2965885B1Tile or masonry saw assembly with double movement
Publication Date: 2020.02.19 HUSQVARNA AB
  • EP2965885B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2965885B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2965885B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A tile or masonry saw assembly (100/200) may include a saw (110/210), a frame (120/220), and a workpiece support (126). The saw (110/210) includes a motor (112/212) operable to turn a blade assembly (114/214) to cut a workpiece. The frame (120/220) is operably coupled to the saw (110/210) to enable the saw (110/210) to be moved along the frame (120/220) in a first direction. The workpiece support (126) is operably coupled to the frame (120/220) to support the workpiece relative to the saw (110/210), and to allow the workpiece support (126) to be moved along the frame (120/220). The saw assembly (100/200) further includes a movement assembly (300) via which both movement of the workpiece support (126) and movement of the saw (110/210) relative to the frame (120/220) is accomplished, such that a movement of the work piece support (126) along the frame (120/220) in a second direction is enabled to cause the saw (110/220) to move along the frame (120/220) in the first direction which is opposite the second direction.