Tillage Tool Wear Forecasting for Planned Replacement Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing the wear condition of chisels and chisel holders in milling and mining processes are inefficient, leading to either premature replacement or loss of productivity due to subjective visual inspections, which do not accurately utilize the remaining wear potential, and are disruptive to operations.

Innovation Solution

A method that records the current state of wear using characteristic values, determines the residual wear capacity, and provides actionable information to operators about the remaining work performance, allowing for optimized machining processes by considering local conditions and material properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspection of the milling drum is performed to assess wear condition, then the wear status can be evaluated, but the machine must be shut down and the inspection is time-consuming, reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear status assessment accuracyVSAvoidmachine availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing wear assessments before the wear limit is actually reached. The system continuously monitors wear parameters and predicts remaining service life, allowing operators to plan tool replacements during scheduled maintenance windows rather than causing unplanned production interruptions. This proactive approach maintains productivity while ensuring tools are replaced at optimal times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual visual inspection method with an automated monitoring system that uses sensors and evaluation units to continuously assess wear conditions. This substitution eliminates the need for machine shutdowns and manual inspections, maintaining both measurement precision and productivity simultaneously by providing real-time wear data without interrupting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If tools are replaced early to avoid damage and ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but cost performance deteriorates due to unused wear potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool performance reliabilityVSAvoidunused wear potential
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual wear conditions and comparing them against wear limits and service life predictions. The evaluation unit provides real-time information about the actual remaining service life based on measured wear parameters, allowing operators to make informed decisions about tool replacement timing. This feedback mechanism ensures tools are used until their actual wear limit is reached, maximizing wear potential utilization while maintaining reliability through accurate condition awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from fixed scheduled replacement intervals to dynamic replacement timing based on actual wear parameters. The system monitors wear rate, wear pattern, and remaining service life parameters, adjusting the replacement decision based on real-time condition data rather than predetermined schedules. This allows tools to be used until their actual wear limit is reached, optimizing both reliability and cost performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If tools are used until wear limit to maximize wear potential, then cost performance is improved, but the risk of tool breakage and secondary damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear potential utilizationVSAvoidtool breakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the remaining service life and warning operators before the wear limit is reached. The system provides advance notice of when tools will reach their wear limit, allowing operators to plan replacements proactively. This prevents tools from being used beyond their wear limit, eliminating the risk of tool breakage and secondary damage while maximizing wear potential utilization up to the optimal replacement point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If subjective visual assessment is used to evaluate wear, then no additional equipment is needed, but the assessment is time-consuming and wear potential is not optimally utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection system simplicityVSAvoidwear assessment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective visual assessment with an automated evaluation system that uses sensors, measurement devices, and computer-based evaluation units. This substitution objective quantifies wear parameters, calculates remaining service life, and provides precise replacement recommendations. The system maintains simplicity by integrating sensors directly into the tool holder and using software-based evaluation, eliminating time-consuming manual inspections while optimizing wear potential utilization through accurate measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3584559B1Wear forecast method for a ground working machine
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 WIRTGEN GMBH
  • EP3584559B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3584559B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3584559B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a wear prediction method or a maintenance method for a tillage machine. It is provided that the current wear condition of one or more tillage tools is recorded. Based on the current wear condition, the remaining wear capacity until the wear limit is reached is then determined according to the invention.