Tilt Angle Contact Discrimination for Touch-Sensitive Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch-sensitive computing devices struggle to distinguish between intentional and unintentional contacts, leading to unwanted input from hand contact or other unintentional sources, which can result in stray marks or inadvertent gestures on the screen.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a tilt sensor to detect the angle of the touch-sensitive surface, allowing the contact discriminating process to modify its parameters or algorithm steps based on the detected tilt angle, thereby differentiating between intentional and unintentional contacts and rejecting unwanted input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If contact discrimination is performed without considering tilt angle, then the contact discrimination process is simple, but the accuracy of distinguishing intentional from unintentional contact is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact discrimination accuracyVSAvoidcontact discrimination process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by incorporating tilt angle detection as an additional parameter in the contact discrimination process. The tilt angle of the touch-sensitive surface is detected and used to modify the discrimination algorithm, allowing the system to distinguish intentional from unintentional contacts more accurately by considering the orientation context of the contact event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The tilt sensor acts as an intermediary element that provides additional contextual information about the surface orientation. This intermediary measurement helps bridge the gap between raw contact data and meaningful contact discrimination, enabling more accurate identification of intentional versus unintentional contacts without requiring complex analysis of the contact data itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If tilt angle detection is added to improve contact discrimination, then the accuracy of distinguishing intentional contact is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tilt sensor serves multiple functions within the system: it detects the orientation of the touch-sensitive surface, provides contextual information for contact discrimination, and helps distinguish between intentional and unintentional contacts. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing a single component that performs several useful roles in improving input reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the contact discriminating process is simplified, then the processing speed is fast, but the ability to reject unintentional contact is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcontact rejection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting the tilt angle in advance of contact discrimination. This pre-detection of surface orientation allows the contact discrimination algorithm to be pre-configured with appropriate thresholds and parameters based on the tilt state, enabling faster processing during actual contact events without sacrificing discrimination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces false acceptance and rejection of contact data, improving the responsiveness and accuracy of touch interactions by adapting to the orientation of the touch-sensitive surface, thus enhancing the user experience by minimizing unintended inputs.

Implementation Method 1

A tilt sensor, such as, but not limited to, an accelerometer device is capable of detecting a tilt angle of the touch-sensitive surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3076280B1Contact discrimination using a tilt angle of a touch -sensitive surface
Publication Date: 2019.10.30 WACOM CO LTD
  • EP3076280B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3076280B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3076280B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

A computing device receives electronic data generated by a touch-sensitive surface in response to a contact made with the touch-sensitive surface, and a tilt sensor detects a tilt angle of the touch-sensitive surface. The tilt angle is indicative of an angular displacement between a reference plane defined by the touch-sensitive surface in a reference position and a current plane defined by the touch-sensitive surface in a current position. A parameter or other aspect of an automated contact discriminating process is modified based at least in part on the detected tilt angle of the touch-sensitive surface. The contact discriminating process determines whether the contact made with the touch-sensitive surface is intentional or not intentional. In response to determining that the contact is intentional, the electronic data is accepted as valid input for further processing. In response to determining that the contact is not intentional, the electronic data is rejected for further processing.