Tilt Bucket Front Structure Visibility and Breakout Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tilt buckets, particularly those designed for multi-axis operation, do not adequately enhance operator visibility and material handling efficiency, as they lack sufficient design parameters to support effective side-to-side pivoting and material engagement.

Innovation Solution

The tilt bucket features a front structure with a base plate, curved wrapper, and boxed section, including specific geometric parameters such as a ratio of maximum distance between the curved wrapper and a tangent point, tilt plates, and side attachments, which improve visibility and material handling by providing a robust and compact design that minimizes edge radius and maximizes break-out force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a tilt bucket is designed with a tilt mechanism mounted adjacent the bucket for multi-axis operation, then the bucket can perform various operations including ditch cleaning, sloping, grading, and finishing work, but operator visibility of the bucket as it engages material is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-axis operation capabilityVSAvoidoperator visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The front structure is designed with different geometric parameters in different regions: the curved wrapper has a specific ratio (0.64-0.70) of maximum distance to line length, the boxed section provides structural reinforcement at the front, and the side attachments extend outward. These localized design variations optimize both the tilt mechanism mounting capability and operator visibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the tilt mechanism structure is mounted adjacent the bucket, then side-to-side pivoting is enabled for various operations, but the structure interferes with operator visibility where the tilting structure must be mounted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside-to-side pivotingVSAvoidoperator visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The side attachments extend laterally from the front structure, utilizing the horizontal dimension to provide mounting surfaces for the tilt mechanism while keeping the vertical profile compact. This dimensional approach allows the tilt mechanism to be mounted without significantly interfering with the operator's vertical line of sight to the bucket.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If the bucket has a compact design with minimized edge radius, then break-out force is maximized, but material handling efficiency may be reduced without proper geometric parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak-out forceVSAvoidmaterial handling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The front structure employs specific geometric parameters: the ratio of maximum distance to line length is optimized to 0.64-0.70, the boxed section provides structural reinforcement, and side attachments are positioned at specific intervals. These parameter optimizations enable the compact design to achieve both high break-out force and efficient material handling by balancing structural integrity with material flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9957689B2Tilt bucket profile and front structure
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US9957689B2 patent drawing
  • US9957689B2 patent drawing
  • US9957689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tilt bucket may include a front structure having an outer surface, the front structure including a base plate with a bottom surface. The tilt bucket may include a bottom edge and a curved wrapper extending between the base plate and the bottom edge. A ratio of a maximum distance between the curved wrapper and a first line extending from the bottom edge to the tangent point on the outer surface of the front structure, taken substantially perpendicularly from the first line, relative to a length of the first line, may be about 0.64 to 0.70.