Tilting Bridge Platform with Integrated Fall Arrest Barrier

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transshipment docks face challenges such as static platforms, varying vehicle heights, and harsh weather conditions, leading to safety risks for operators and increased complexity in installation, particularly due to the need for extensive civil engineering works.

Innovation Solution

A back-to-back tilting bridge with an electro-hydraulic or pneumatic system, featuring a sheet metal platform, side skirts, integrated buffers, and a one-piece frame, which forms a fall arrest barrier and allows for safe pedestrian passage, and can be installed quickly without major civil works by fitting within standard dock shelters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional static transshipment docks are used, then the structure is simple and stable, but the difference in level between the quay and various vehicles cannot be accommodated, creating safety risks and preventing passage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to various vehicle heightsVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bridge is designed as a movable structure that can tilt and adjust its angle relative to the quay. The platform can rotate around a horizontal axis to adapt to different vehicle bed heights, transforming the static dock into a dynamic system that maintains adaptability while managing structural complexity through controlled motion mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The bridge structure serves multiple functions: it acts as a walkway for operators, provides a barrier to prevent falls, enables passage for trolleys and cargo, and adapts to various vehicle types. This multi-functionality addresses the adaptability requirement while the integrated design helps manage overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If dock levelers with barriers and refuge zones are used, then operator safety is improved, but many voluminous parts are required which need major civil engineering work at the quay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bridge integrates multiple safety and functional elements into a single unified structure. The barrier, platform, and support mechanisms are combined into one assembly that can be installed as a complete unit, reducing the need for separate civil engineering works while maintaining comprehensive operator safety protections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bridge is designed as a modular structure with distinct segments that can be assembled and installed separately. The platform, barriers, and support components are segmented to facilitate easier transportation and installation, reducing the major civil engineering work required at the quay location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If autodock bridges with multiple feet and support studs are installed, then structural stability is improved, but complicated civil works are required including installation of support studs for each foot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidinstallation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bridge uses an integrated frame structure where the support function is merged into the main body of the bridge rather than requiring separate support studs. The frame itself provides structural stability while eliminating the need for additional civil engineering installations, simplifying the overall installation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If the bridge is designed to allow operator access to open curtain doors, then operational flexibility is improved, but operators face risks of falls, crushing, and injuries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidsafety risks for operators
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bridge platform extends to provide a safe working surface that reaches the vehicle bed level before operators need to access the curtain doors. This prior positioning of the platform eliminates the need for operators to stand in voids or precarious positions, cushioning them from fall and crushing risks while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a safe and efficient transshipment process by eliminating the need for extensive civil engineering, protecting operators from falls and crushing, and allowing for easy installation and operation in various weather conditions, while adapting to different vehicle heights.

Implementation Method 1

a back-to-back tilting bridge, according to claim 1, under the effect of electro-hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

a back-to-back tilting bridge, according to claim 1, under the effect of electro-hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The platform is hinged to the chassis, rising under the pivoting effect of the cylinder in an almost vertical position of the anti-fall platform barrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivoting motion: Hinge

Data Source

PatentEP2733097B1Leaning bridge, method for installing same and use thereof
Publication Date: 2015.09.16 EXPRESSO FRANCE
  • EP2733097B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2733097B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2733097B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The bridge (1) has a single piece frame provided with integrated stops (3) on an outer surface, where the stops are placed laterally. A central space forms refuge with sheet cap on an interior face turned toward a quay. An onboard hydro-electric power station is provided inside the frame. The platform is articulated on the frame, where the platform is raised under pivoting effect of a central jack (24) in quasi vertical position of anti-fall quay and descended in work, floating and/or fixed position. The platform is controlled by the hydro-electric power station. An independent claim is also included for a method for installing a leaning bridge.