Tiltrotor Rotor Position Control via Aerodynamic Drag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for controlling rotor position in tiltrotor aircraft are heavy and require extensive maintenance, adding to the overall weight and complexity of the aircraft while not efficiently managing aerodynamic drag during non-use modes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a rotor position control system utilizing off-axis tilting gearboxes and electric motors, allowing rotors to be actively moved to low aerodynamic drag positions using a phase lock mechanism, which reduces weight and maintenance needs by minimizing download in hover mode and optimizing power usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mechanical components are used for rotor position control, then rotor positioning is achieved, but aircraft weight increases and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor positioning capabilityVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical position control components with an aerodynamic solution where rotor blade orientation itself creates drag-based positioning force. The rotor blades are oriented at specific angles (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the rotor axis, allowing aerodynamic drag to naturally position and hold the rotor in desired positions without heavy mechanical actuators or sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the rotor blades' own aerodynamic interaction with the air flow to achieve self-positioning and self-holding. The asymmetric drag forces generated by blades at specific orientations automatically create restoring forces that maintain rotor position, eliminating the need for external mechanical positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional mechanical components are used for rotor position control, then rotor positioning is achieved, but maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor positioning capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing mechanical positioning mechanisms with aerodynamic drag-based positioning, the patent eliminates moving parts, bearings, gears, and sensors that would require maintenance. The positioning function is achieved through the natural aerodynamic interaction between rotor blades and air flow, requiring no active maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The aerodynamic positioning system is self-regulating and requires no maintenance intervention. The rotor blades automatically find and maintain their optimal orientations through aerodynamic forces, with no mechanical components to wear, fail, or require adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If rotors are not actively positioned in low drag configurations, then simpler control systems are used, but aerodynamic drag increases during non-use modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the rotor blade orientation dynamic and adjustable, allowing blades to be positioned at optimal angles (e.g., 45 degrees) during non-use modes to minimize drag. This dynamic reconfiguration capability allows the system to adapt to different operational states, reducing energy loss when rotors are not providing thrust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the orientation parameter of rotor blades relative to the rotor axis, positioning them at specific angles that minimize aerodynamic drag during non-use modes. This parameter adjustment transforms the rotors from potential drag sources into aerodynamically efficient configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the weight and maintenance requirements of tiltrotor aircraft while improving propulsive efficiency by minimizing download in hover mode and optimizing power usage, allowing for efficient thrust generation and reduced drag during non-use modes.

Implementation Method 1

The implementation of a rotor position control system utilizing off-axis tilting gearboxes and electric motors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

cogging torque level resistance... sufficient to return the rotor to an indexed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS20240278909A1Rotor position control system
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 TEXTRON EAVIATION INC
  • US20240278909A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278909A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278909A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An tiltrotor aircraft includes a rotor position control system (RPCS). The RPCS includes an electric motor configured to selectively rotate the rotor blade, a target marker kinematically associated with the rotor blade, a sensor configured to sense a position of the target marker, and a flight control computer configured to selectively control the electric motor in a normal mode of operation in which the rotor blade provides thrust and a phase lock mode of operation in which the electric motor maintains the rotor blade in a predetermined indexed position.