Tiltrotor Wing Extensions Synchronized with Rotor Slipstream

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tiltrotor aircraft with fixed nacelles experience high download forces on wing extensions due to rotorwash during vertical takeoff, hovering, and landing, reducing lift generation by proprotors.

Innovation Solution

A pylon assembly with rotatably coupled wing extensions that synchronize with the rotor assembly, keeping the minimal dimension within the slipstream, and a stabilization system using actuators and feedback loops to oscillate wing extensions and dampen structural modes, reducing download forces and enhancing stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wing extensions are attached to fixed nacelles, then the effective wingspan is increased to assist cruise efficiency and range, but high download forces are caused on the wing extensions due to rotorwash during vertical takeoff, hovering, and landing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecruise efficiencyVSAvoiddownload forces on wing extensions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The wing extensions are made dynamically rotatable relative to the fixed nacelles, allowing them to change orientation between horizontal (for cruise efficiency) and vertical/aligned with rotor wash (to minimize download forces during VTOL operations). This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the wing extension configuration to different flight phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The orientation parameter of the wing extensions is changed based on flight mode. During cruise, the wing extensions are positioned horizontally to maximize wingspan and efficiency. During vertical takeoff, hovering, and landing, the wing extensions are rotated to align with the rotor wash direction, changing their aerodynamic parameters to minimize harmful download forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If wing extensions remain fixed in horizontal orientation, then structural simplicity is maintained, but lift generation by proprotors is reduced due to rotorwash interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidlift generation by proprotors
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The wing extensions incorporate a rotation mechanism that allows them to dynamically adjust their orientation relative to the nacelles and rotor assembly. This dynamic capability enables the system to optimize lift generation by positioning wing extensions away from rotor wash during vertical operations while maintaining structural efficiency during cruise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The wing extension system is segmented into rotatable sections that can independently adjust their orientation. This segmentation allows different parts of the wing structure to be positioned optimally for different flight phases, reducing rotor wash interference during VTOL while maintaining cruise efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If wing extensions are made rotatable to synchronize with rotor assembly, then download forces are minimized by keeping minimal dimension in slipstream, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownload forces on wing extensionsVSAvoidrotational mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotation mechanism for the wing extensions is merged with the existing rotor assembly mounting structure. The wing extensions are coupled to the rotor assembly through shared mechanical interfaces and actuation systems, so that the same rotational actuation that positions the rotor also positions the wing extensions, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotational mechanism serves multiple functions: it positions both the rotor assembly and the wing extensions simultaneously, and it can operate in different modes (full rotation, partial rotation, locked positions) depending on flight phase. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated mechanisms for each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If actuators and feedback loops are added for stabilization, then structural vibrations are dampened and stability is improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Feedback sensors detect structural vibrations and wing extension position, and this information is fed to control systems that adjust actuator commands in real-time. This closed-loop feedback stabilizes the aircraft by continuously counteracting disturbances while optimizing wing extension orientation during flight transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilization system utilizes controlled mechanical vibrations and oscillations of the wing extensions to counteract unwanted structural vibrations through active damping. By introducing controlled vibrational movements, the system reduces overall structural vibrations and improves stability during flight operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Minimizes download forces on wing extensions by keeping them within the slipstream and stabilizes the aircraft by actively oscillating wing extensions to counteract structural vibrations, improving lift generation and overall flight efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A rotor assembly is rotatably coupled to the fixed pylon and is operable to rotate between a vertical takeoff and landing orientation and a forward flight orientation. The rotor assembly includes a proprotor operable to produce a slipstream.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSlipstream: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

The wing extension is operable to rotate generally with the rotor assembly such that the minimal dimension of the wing extension remains in the slipstream of the proprotor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Implementation Method 3

An actuator is coupled to the wing extension and is operable to move the wing extension to dampen a mode of the wing, thereby stabilizing the tiltrotor aircraft.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10173771B2Tiltrotor aircraft having rotatable wing extensions
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • US10173771B2 patent drawing
  • US10173771B2 patent drawing
  • US10173771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pylon assembly for a tiltrotor aircraft includes a fixed pylon having an outboard end. A rotor assembly is rotatably coupled to the fixed pylon and is operable to rotate between a a vertical takeoff and landing orientation and a forward flight orientation. The rotor assembly includes a proprotor operable to produce a slipstream. A wing extension is rotatably coupled to the outboard end of the fixed pylon. The wing extension is operable to rotate generally with the rotor assembly such that a minimal dimension of the wing extension remains in the slipstream of the proprotor.