Time Dependent Service Level Objectives for I/O Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data storage systems lack the ability to dynamically adjust service level objectives (SLOs) for I/O operations based on specific processes and their instances, leading to inefficient resource allocation and performance variations across different times and applications.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that tag I/O operations with a unique tag value associated with the process name, allowing the data storage system to determine and apply specific service level objectives based on time-specific criteria, using a table that maps process names to service level objective-time frame pairs, and defaults to a lower or higher service level depending on the time criteria met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single service level objective is applied to all I/O operations, then system simplicity is maintained, but performance optimization for specific processes and time periods is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveI/O operation performanceVSAvoidSLO management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments service level objectives by process name and time frames, dividing the monolithic SLO management into granular, process-specific time-dependent SLOs. Each process can have its own SLO profile activated during specific time periods, allowing differentiated performance management without overwhelming complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic SLO adjustment by transitioning from static, universal SLOs to time-dependent, process-specific SLOs that automatically activate and deactivate based on current time and process identity. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt service levels in real-time according to operational requirements while maintaining automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If service levels are adjusted dynamically based on process and time, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveService level adaptabilityVSAvoidSLO determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring process names, time frames, and associated SLOs in advance through automated discovery and configuration mechanisms. The system discovers processes, determines their SLO requirements, and sets up time-dependent SLO profiles beforehand, so that during runtime, the system only needs to match current process and time against pre-established rules, reducing runtime complexity while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically discovering processes on the host, determining their service level requirements, and configuring time-dependent SLOs without manual intervention. The automated discovery and configuration mechanisms enable the system to self-manage the complexity of dynamic SLO assignment, allowing high adaptability while minimizing operational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple service level objectives are maintained for different processes, then performance differentiation is achieved, but resource overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveService level guaranteeVSAvoidNumber of SLO configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a unified time-dependent SLO framework that serves multiple processes with different requirements through a single structured system. Instead of maintaining separate, independent SLO configurations for each process, the universal framework handles process identification, time frame matching, and SLO selection in a consolidated manner, reducing the effective number of active configurations while maintaining comprehensive service level guarantees across all processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10503672B2Time dependent service level objectives
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10503672B2 patent drawing
  • US10503672B2 patent drawing
  • US10503672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for processing I/O operations that may include: issuing, by a process of an application on a host, an I/O operation; tagging the I/O operation with a tag value in accordance with a process name associated with the process that issued the I/O operation; sending the I/O operation from the host to a data storage system; and determining, on the data storage system, an service level objective (SLO) for the I/O operation in accordance with the tag value of the I/O operation. The process name may include a first portion and a second customizable or configurable portion used to distinguish between different instance of the same application process. It may be determined which of multiple time-dependent SLOs for the process name is active and used with the I/O operation based on a receipt or processing time associated with the I/O operation.