Time Domain Vibration Control for Cryocoolers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vibration reduction systems for cryocoolers require significant processing power for frequency-based analysis, which is not feasible for lower-cost systems, leading to performance degradation due to unaddressed mechanical disturbances.

Innovation Solution

A time-domain vibration control algorithm that adjusts amplitude and phase coefficients of the modeled vibration signal to generate control signals, reducing the need for frequency-based analysis and processing power, using techniques like RMS averaging to iteratively correct harmonic components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If frequency-based analysis algorithms (FFT or convolution-based analysis) are used to process vibration signals, then measurement precision and vibration reduction effectiveness are improved, but processing power requirements and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration measurement precisionVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential characteristics needed for vibration reduction by using time-domain analysis that focuses on RMS values and waveform comparisons, eliminating the need for complex frequency decomposition while retaining the critical information needed to generate effective cancellation signals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of decomposing the vibration signal into frequency components and then reconstructing cancellation signals (the conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by directly analyzing the time-domain waveform characteristics and using them to generate cancellation signals without intermediate frequency-domain transformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If frequency-based analysis algorithms are used to process vibration signals, then vibration reduction effectiveness is improved, but processing speed and computational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration reduction effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential RMS value and waveform timing characteristics from the vibration signal, eliminating computationally intensive frequency decomposition steps while retaining the critical information needed to generate effective cancellation signals in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analysis parameter from frequency-domain representation (requiring FFT or convolution) to time-domain RMS values and waveform comparisons, which can be computed much faster while still providing sufficient information for effective vibration cancellation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional frequency-based vibration reduction systems are implemented, then vibration control precision is improved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential RMS value and phase information from vibration signals, eliminating the need for complex frequency decomposition and reconstruction systems while maintaining sufficient control precision for practical applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a simplified feedback mechanism that directly compares time-domain RMS values and adjusts cancellation signal amplitude accordingly, eliminating the need for complex iterative frequency-domain optimization while achieving effective vibration reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8639388B2Time domain vibration reduction and control
Publication Date: 2014.01.28 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8639388B2 patent drawing
  • US8639388B2 patent drawing
  • US8639388B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vibration control system includes a mechanical system which generates vibration; a sensor configured to measure the vibration and generate a vibration signal thereof, and a processor configured: (a) receive a vibration signal from a sensor in a mechanical system; (b) model the vibration signal using a time-domain function; (c) adjust one of an amplitude coefficient and a phase coefficient of the modeled vibration signal; (d) output a control signal corresponding to the modeled vibration signal to the mechanical system so as to reduce the vibration; and (e) receive another vibration signal from the sensor. Steps (c)-(e) are repeated when the average value of the vibration signal is greater than a predetermined value. A method for vibration control is also disclosed.