Time Slot Allocation for Shared Mesh Protection Bundled Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protection and recovery mechanisms face challenges in efficiently managing time slot allocation and sharing in large optical shared mesh networks, particularly in bundled links, leading to complexities in maximizing bandwidth utilization and service differentiation.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine unused time slots, sort connections based on used time slots, and assign them optimally to new circuits, utilizing a controller with memory and logic circuit to manage time division multiplexed transmission, ensuring maximum bandwidth usage and handling multiple failure scenarios while differentiating service classes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple protect circuits share the same time slots on bundled links, then bandwidth utilization is improved, but time slot allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilizationVSAvoidtime slot allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the time slot allocation process into distinct phases: identifying available time slots on bundled links, evaluating protection criteria for different service classes, and systematically assigning time slots to protect circuits. This segmentation transforms the complex allocation problem into manageable steps, reducing allocation complexity while maintaining high bandwidth utilization through shared time slots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification and evaluation of time slots before actual allocation. By pre-assessing which time slots are available on bundled links and evaluating protection criteria in advance, the system prepares allocation data structures that simplify the subsequent assignment process, thereby reducing real-time allocation complexity while maximizing bandwidth sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If time slots are shared among multiple protect circuits, then network resource efficiency is improved, but the risk of bandwidth fragmentation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resource efficiencyVSAvoidbandwidth fragmentation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor time slot usage patterns and protection circuit activation status. This feedback enables the system to dynamically adjust time slot assignments, consolidating bandwidth usage and preventing fragmentation. The feedback loop ensures that shared time slots remain efficiently utilized while maintaining stable bandwidth allocation across protect circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes allocation parameters based on observed network conditions and protection circuit performance. By adjusting time slot assignment criteria and re-evaluating protection requirements, the system optimizes bandwidth sharing while preventing fragmentation. Parameter changes allow flexible adaptation to maintain both resource efficiency and bandwidth stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If service differentiation is implemented for different classes of protect circuits, then quality of service is improved, but allocation management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of serviceVSAvoidallocation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing service differentiation at specific allocation decision points rather than throughout the entire system. Different protection criteria and time slot assignment rules are applied locally based on service class requirements, enabling quality of service improvement while containing management complexity to specific manageable areas of the allocation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of service class classification into the time slot allocation system. By adding this dimensional layer, the system can differentiate quality of service for various protect circuits while managing complexity through structured classification. This dimensional approach organizes allocation management in a systematic way that improves reliability without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10075259B2Systems and methods of time slot allocation for shared mesh protection on bundled links
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 INFINERA CORP
  • US10075259B2 patent drawing
  • US10075259B2 patent drawing
  • US10075259B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for time slot allocation of time slots for bundled links in a shared mesh GMPLS for protect paths with different of COS may include time slot allocation divided into multiple phases with each phase having some qualification criterion to go to next phase or exit if the criterion is not met. For example, allocation of time slots for a circuit may include three phases—component selection phase, a connection admission phase, and an optimization phase.