Time-Stamped Computer Tags for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network security methods, such as login names and passwords, hardware tokens, and digital certificates, are inadequate in preventing fraudulent transactions and identity theft due to vulnerabilities like password predictability, hardware visibility, and IP spoofing, necessitating a more robust and user-transparent solution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing time-stamped computer tags, which include encrypted server timestamp information, to analyze device activity and detect suspicious behavior by comparing tag creation dates with account usage history, thereby preventing unauthorized access and reducing the risk of fraud and identity theft.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods (passwords, hardware tokens, digital certificates) are used, then basic security is provided, but they are vulnerable to fraud, identity theft, and security breaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidfraud and identity theft risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by assigning computer tags to devices before they attempt access to the network. These tags contain device identification information that is analyzed in advance to detect potential fraud. The fraud detection system examines the tags and compares them against known fraudulent patterns, allowing the system to prevent fraudulent access before it occurs, rather than relying solely on reactive authentication methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If hardware security devices (tokens, dongles) are implemented, then secondary authentication is provided, but they are visible, can be copied, and increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using physical hardware devices that can be copied or stolen, the system uses virtual computer tags that are assigned to devices. These tags contain device identification information and are stored in the device's memory or registry. The tags are much harder to copy or simulate compared to physical hardware devices, providing security without the complexity and vulnerability of hardware tokens or dongles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If digital certificates from third parties are used, then authentication is provided, but they can be stolen, require significant trust in third parties, and burden users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication verificationVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the authentication verification function from third-party certificate authorities and implements it within the network's own fraud detection system. The computer tags contain device identification information that is analyzed by the network's own fraud detection system, eliminating the need for external certificate authorities. This reduces user burden and eliminates reliance on third parties while maintaining authentication verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If IP addresses are used for location verification, then basic user verification is provided, but they are easily spoofed and provide limited security

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser location verificationVSAvoidverification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the verification parameter from IP addresses (which can be spoofed) to computer tags containing device identification information. These tags are assigned to specific devices and are much harder to spoof or falsify. The fraud detection system analyzes these tags to verify device identity, providing more accurate and reliable verification compared to IP address-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9060012B2Methods and apparatus for detecting fraud with time based computer tags
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 THE 41ST PARAMETER
  • US9060012B2 patent drawing
  • US9060012B2 patent drawing
  • US9060012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for creating and analyzing computer tag information for the prevention or detection of potential fraud. Computers and other devices accessing the Web carry device tags with date and time information describing when they were issued by a security tag server. A server time stamp may be inserted into time based computer tags such as a cookies indicating when they were created. Such time stamp information can be encrypted and analyzed during future attempts to access a secure network such as a customer attempting to log into an online banking account. When the time stamp information from the tag is compared to other selected information about the user, device and/or account, including but not limited to last account log-in date/time or account creation date, the invention may be used to detect suspicious activity.