Timed Deer Feeder Flap Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing animal feed dispensing devices often scatter feed over a wide area, attracting non-targeted animals and damaging equipment due to their design, which results in inefficiency and reduced functionality.

Innovation Solution

A deer feeder design that positions a hopper and electrical components above the ground, using a pivoted flap mechanism and timer-controlled dispenser to provide a controlled amount of feed accessible only to targeted animals, reducing waste and equipment damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If feed is scattered over a wide area using traditional dispensing devices, then more animals can access the feed, but non-targeted animals consume the feed and equipment damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed distribution effectivenessVSAvoidfeed waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The feeder divides the feed dispensing into controlled segments through multiple discharge tubes with individual flap controls, allowing selective feeding to specific locations rather than widespread scattering, thus reducing feed waste while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements local quality by positioning discharge tubes at specific heights and locations where only targeted animals (deer) can access the feed, while creating a physical barrier (flaps) that prevents non-targeted animals from reaching the feed, thereby reducing feed waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the feeder is positioned close to the ground for easy animal access, then more animals can reach the feed, but equipment becomes vulnerable to damage from animal contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal access to feedVSAvoidequipment durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from ground-level feeding to an elevated feeding dimension by positioning discharge tubes and flaps at heights accessible to deer but not to the ground. This vertical dimensionality change allows animals to access feed through the flaps while protecting electrical and moving parts from animal contact and damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The flap acts as an intermediary mechanism between the feed and the animals. It allows targeted animals to access the feed when opened while blocking non-targeted animals or preventing equipment damage when closed, thus mediating the interaction between feed dispensing and animal access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If electrical and moving parts are placed below the hopper for structural stability, then the apparatus is more stable, but animals can damage the electrical wiring and components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus stabilityVSAvoidanimal damage to electrical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the electrical and moving parts from the vulnerable lower region and relocates them to the upper region above the hopper. This extraction removes the harmful components from the area where animals can access and damage them, while the hopper structure provides stable support for the relocated components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9686965B2Timed deer feeder with restricted access
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 BNR TECH DEV
  • US9686965B2 patent drawing
  • US9686965B2 patent drawing
  • US9686965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An animal feed dispenser includes a feeding tube for receiving a predetermined amount of animal feed from a hopper. The feeding tube includes at least one opening through which animals may access the interior of the feeding tube. The opening may be closed by a movable closure flap so as to restrict access to the animal feed located within the feeding tube.