Timepiece Oscillator Pairing Through Vibration-Based Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing watch components, such as balance wheels and hairsprings, are complex, costly, and prone to errors due to lengthy and tedious classification processes, leading to high scrap rates and the need for extensive part stocks.

Innovation Solution

A method involving partial manufacturing of inertial and elastic return members, followed by uncoupled vibration excitation and prediction of essential characteristics, allowing for tailored manufacturing of complementary components to achieve a predetermined oscillation frequency and thermal stability, reducing the need for pre-classification and stockpiling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional classification and pairing methods are used for watch components, then assembly performance can be guaranteed, but the manufacturing process becomes complex and time-consuming with high scrap rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical classification process with acoustic resonance frequency measurement. By measuring the resonance frequency of components individually, the system automatically determines the appropriate pairing without manual classification, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining assembly performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Each component is measured individually for its acoustic resonance frequency, and this measurement automatically determines its pairing requirements. The system uses the component's own characteristics to guide its pairing, eliminating the need for external classification processes and reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If traditional classification and pairing methods are used for watch components, then assembly performance can be guaranteed, but the process is lengthy and tedious leading to high scrap rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the tedious manual classification process with automated acoustic resonance frequency measurement. This allows for rapid measurement of each component's characteristics, automatically determining pairing requirements without the lengthy and tedious steps of traditional classification, thereby improving manufacturing efficiency while maintaining assembly performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If traditional classification and pairing methods are used for watch components, then matching components can be identified, but extensive part stocks must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent matchingVSAvoidpart stock requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent measures the acoustic resonance frequency of each component and uses this feedback information to determine the exact pairing requirements. This allows for precise matching without needing to maintain extensive inventories of pre-classified parts, as the measurement results directly guide the pairing process and reduce the need for buffer stocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If traditional classification and pairing methods are used for watch components, then component pairing can be achieved, but the process is prone to errors and breakages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent pairingVSAvoidpairing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual classification and pairing operations with automated acoustic resonance frequency measurement. This eliminates the human error and physical handling issues associated with traditional methods, providing more precise and reliable component matching while reducing the risk of breakages during the pairing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the manufacturing process, reduces scrap rates, and ensures precise operation by custom-manufacturing components that meet specific oscillation and thermal requirements, eliminating the need for extensive part stocks and reducing operational complexity.

Implementation Method 1

imposing a vibration excitation on said at least one: of the inertial element in an uncoupled state and of the elastic return member in an uncoupled state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

measuring a vibration response: of the uncoupled inertial element and predicting an inertia of the inertial element with an inertia prediction machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentEP4614242A1Manufacturing and pairing of timepiece components
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 RICHEMONT INTERNATIONAL SA
  • EP4614242A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4614242A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4614242A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a clock oscillator (10) comprising the steps of: - (E10) manufacturing one of the inertial element and the elastic return member, - (E20) imposing a vibrational excitation and measuring a vibrational response on said manufactured component, - (E30) predicting an inertia of the manufactured inertial element or a stiffness of the manufactured elastic return member: - (E40) providing a pairing: • of the inertial element having the inertia predicted in the previous step, by deducing a target stiffness of an elastic return member to be paired, or • of the elastic return member having the stiffness predicted in the previous step, by deducing a target inertia of an inertial element required to be paired.