Timer Validity Signaling for Communication Network Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In communication networks, timers used for supervising communication procedures can become out-of-sync across entities, leading to premature timeouts and unwanted remote actions, especially in large networks with multiple destinations and alternative routing paths, where manual coordination of timer settings is necessary but lacks logic for informing peers about timer usage.

Innovation Solution

A method where entities determine supervision conditions and add timer validity information to signaling messages, allowing entities involved in communication procedures to manage timer validity and synchronization, ensuring accurate timeout supervision and preventing premature terminations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual coordination of timer settings is used between entities, then timer synchronization can be achieved, but the complexity of configuration and maintenance increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimer synchronizationVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each entity autonomously determines its own timer values based on local supervision conditions and communicates these values to peer entities through signaling messages. This eliminates the need for external manual coordination while maintaining synchronization, as each entity independently manages and shares its timer configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Entities exchange timer validity information through signaling messages, creating a feedback mechanism where each entity is informed about the timer settings of others. This allows dynamic adaptation and automatic synchronization without manual intervention, as entities can adjust their behavior based on received timer information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If entities keep track of their own timers independently, then each entity can manage its timing accurately, but communication procedures can get out-of-sync across the network

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal timer accuracyVSAvoidcommunication synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By exchanging timer validity information in signaling messages, entities receive feedback about peer timer states. This allows each entity to maintain accurate local timing while also being aware of network-wide timer status, enabling synchronization without compromising local precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Timer validity information acts as an intermediary data element that carries timing state between entities. This intermediary information allows entities to coordinate their independent timer operations without direct interference, maintaining both local accuracy and global synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If timer values are configured manually for each entity, then timer settings can be optimized, but the process is time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimer configuration accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Entities automatically determine their own timer values based on local supervision conditions without requiring manual configuration. This self-service approach eliminates time-consuming manual setup while maintaining optimized timer settings adapted to local network conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Timer validity information is determined and communicated in advance before communication procedures begin. This preliminary establishment of timer values allows entities to be immediately operational without time-consuming configuration processes while ensuring accurate timer settings from the start

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10015292B2Handling of timers
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US10015292B2 patent drawing
  • US10015292B2 patent drawing
  • US10015292B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, entities, and computer program for handling timers in a communication network are described. The communication network comprises a plurality of entities (100-108). The method in a first entity (100) comprises determining (301) whether a supervision condition for supervising a communication procedure is fulfilled. The method further comprises adding (308), based on a result of the step of determining the supervision condition (301), a timer validity information to a signaling message related to the communication procedure, and sending (308) the signaling message to a second entity (102). The method in a second entity (102-108) comprises receiving (400) a signaling message associated with a communication procedure, the signaling message containing a timer validity information. The method further comprises determining (401) whether a further processing condition for performing further steps of the communication procedure is fulfilled, the further processing condition being associated with the timer validity information. The system, entities (100-108) and computer program associated with these methods are also described. Therefore an improved handling of time supervisions in a communication network is achieved in terms of accuracy of supervision timeout, and eliminating a triggering of unwanted remote actions after local timeout.