Timeseries DCF Capabilities to Predict Data Interactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional data management paradigms are inadequate in predicting and supporting data access processes and interactions in heterogeneous distributed environments like a Data Confidence Fabric (DCF), making it difficult to gain insights into suspicious activities and data behavior, especially since DCFs operate primarily at the application layer and lack comprehensive control over data movement.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that maps DCF information, such as confidence scores and annotations, onto a timeline to create a timeseries view, allowing for the identification, assessment, and prediction of data behavior as data transits through the DCF, including determining data paths, identifying unexpected gaps, and predicting future interactions using machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional data management paradigms are used in a Data Confidence Fabric, then the system structure remains simple and manageable, but the ability to predict and support data access processes and interactions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a timeseries service as an intermediary component between the data confidence fabric and prediction requirements. This service ingests DCF information, maps it to a timeseries view, and provides prediction capabilities without fundamentally redesigning the entire DCF architecture, thus adding prediction reliability while controlling system complexity through a dedicated intermediary layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms DCF information by mapping it to a timeseries view, adding a temporal dimension to the data. This allows prediction of data access processes and interactions by analyzing trends over time, thereby improving prediction capability while maintaining the original DCF structure through a dimensional transformation approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the Data Confidence Fabric operates only at the application layer, then the implementation scope is limited and easier to manage, but it is difficult to gain insights about data behavior and suspicious activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoiddata behavior insight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the timeseries service continuously ingests DCF information, analyzes it through timeseries mapping, and generates predictions about data behavior. This feedback loop enables the system to gain insights into suspicious activities and data patterns while maintaining operational simplicity through automated analysis processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary mapping of DCF information to a timeseries view, organizing data in a structured temporal format before analysis. This preliminary action enables more effective detection of suspicious activities and data behavior patterns, thereby reducing information loss while keeping the operational framework simple and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12111914B2Timeseries DCF capabilities to predict data interactions based on past trends
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 DELL PROD LP
  • US12111914B2 patent drawing
  • US12111914B2 patent drawing
  • US12111914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method is performed in connection with a data confidence fabric. This method includes generating information about data as the data transits a data confidence fabric, ingesting the information, mapping the ingested information to a timeline, evaluating the timeline, based on the evaluating, generating a recommendation for an action concerning the data, and implementing the action in the data confidence fabric. In this method, the evaluating includes determining if any unexpected time gaps occurred as the data transited the data confidence fabric.