Timing Advance Group Timer Control for Uplink Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing timing advance groups (TAGs) to optimize data transmission and reduce latency, particularly in heterogeneous networks with varying cell sizes and traffic loads.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a mechanism to dynamically manage multiple timing advance groups (TAGs) based on network conditions, device capabilities, and traffic characteristics, allowing for flexible configuration and optimization of data transmission protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single timing advance group is used for all serving cells, then device complexity is reduced, but transmission reliability deteriorates due to inability to handle varying timing requirements of different cell sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming advance group management complexityVSAvoiduplink transmission timing alignment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the timing advance management into multiple independent timing advance groups (TAGs), where each TAG can be independently configured and managed. This segmentation allows different serving cells to have their own timing advance parameters, resolving the contradiction by enabling precise timing control for each cell while maintaining manageable complexity through structured group organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different timing advance characteristics for different TAGs based on their specific requirements. Each TAG can have customized timing advance values and expiration behaviors suited to its particular cell size and propagation characteristics, rather than applying a uniform timing advance configuration across all cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If timing advance timer expiration is not differentiated by TAG, then control signaling overhead is reduced, but transmission efficiency deteriorates due to conservative timing advance updates across all cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signaling overheadVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the timing advance timer management by introducing separate timers for each TAG (e.g., timeAlignmentTimer1, timeAlignmentTimer2). This allows independent expiration and renewal of timing advance for different TAGs, enabling efficient data transmission in TAGs with valid timing advance while avoiding unnecessary re-synchronization in other TAGs, thus improving productivity without excessive signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic TAG-specific timer management where each TAG's timing advance timer can be independently started, stopped, or renewed based on uplink transmission activity in that specific TAG. This dynamic approach optimizes transmission efficiency by maintaining timing advance validity in active TAGs while reducing control overhead through selective timer management rather than blanket updates across all cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If timing advance is updated for all serving cells simultaneously, then timing alignment consistency is improved, but latency increases due to waiting for the longest propagation delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming alignment consistencyVSAvoidtiming advance update latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments timing advance updates into TAG-specific operations, allowing each TAG to be updated independently based on its own timing requirements. This enables shorter-latency updates for TAGs with smaller propagation delays while maintaining overall timing consistency through coordinated management of multiple TAGs, resolving the contradiction between consistency and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by maintaining timing advance validity in each TAG through independent timer management. When uplink transmission is scheduled in a specific TAG, the system checks whether that TAG's timing advance is still valid before transmission, rather than waiting for a global timing advance update. This preliminary validation approach reduces latency by allowing immediate transmission in TAGs with valid timing advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250386311A1Time Alignment Timer Expiration Based on Timing Advance Group
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20250386311A1 patent drawing
  • US20250386311A1 patent drawing
  • US20250386311A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method can include receiving one or more messages indicating multiple timing advance groups (TAGs) that include a first primary timing advance group (PTAG), for a special cell (SpCell), associated with a first uplink transmission configuration indication (TCI) state; a second PTAG, for the SpCell, associated with a second uplink TCI state; and a secondary TAG (STAG) for a secondary cell (SCell). The one or more messages can also indicate a first time alignment timer (TAT) for the first PTAG, a second TAT for the second PTAG, and a third TAT for the STAG. The method can also include transmitting, via a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) of the SpCell, an uplink transport block while the second TAT is running and the first TAT is expired.