Timing Tracking Loop Using Maximum Region Detector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional delay lock loop (DLL) systems with maximum tap power detectors experience noise-induced failures due to tap energy variations and estimation errors in multipath channels, leading to channel estimation window drift and communication link failure.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a maximum region detector that analyzes the entire channel profile through over-sampling and finite impulse response filtering to select the tap with maximum regional power, reducing noise and spectral aliasing, and using a window timing loop adjuster to maintain accurate channel estimation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a maximum tap power detector is used to select the target for DLL tracking, then the system can lock to the channel tap with maximum power under general channel conditions, but noise-induced failures occur due to tap energy variations and estimation errors in multipath channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetap power detection accuracyVSAvoidtracking stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel profile into multiple regions and performs over-sampling within each region to identify the maximum regional power. This segmentation approach divides the problematic single tap selection into multiple regional assessments, reducing the impact of noise on any individual tap measurement while maintaining the ability to track the dominant path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary filtering and over-sampling actions before final tap selection. By pre-processing the channel estimates through finite impulse response filtering and accumulating power measurements across multiple samples, the system prepares more reliable data before making the final tracking decision, thereby reducing noise-induced failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If over-sampling and finite impulse response filtering are applied to select the tap with maximum regional power, then noise and spectral aliasing are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sampling parameter by performing over-sampling at multiple points within each regional window. This parameter change allows the system to accumulate more measurement data without fundamentally changing the detector architecture, achieving noise reduction through increased sampling density rather than complex filtering structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of the channel estimation process by performing over-sampling and creating virtual measurements at different points within the regional window. These copied measurements are then combined through accumulation and filtering to produce a more reliable estimate, avoiding the need for complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the channel estimation window is adjusted to track maximum power taps, then the system can adapt to channel variations, but channel estimation window drift occurs leading to communication link failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel adaptationVSAvoidwindow position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the regional power distribution and adjusting the channel estimation window position based on the identified maximum regional power location. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to channel variations while maintaining window stability through controlled, incremental adjustments rather than abrupt position changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by allowing the channel estimation window position to adaptively change in response to detected maximum regional power shifts. The window position becomes a dynamic parameter that evolves with channel conditions, enabling the system to track multipath variations while maintaining stability through smooth transitions rather than abrupt jumps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9484620B2Systems and methods for providing timing tracking loops in a communication system
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9484620B2 patent drawing
  • US9484620B2 patent drawing
  • US9484620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are disclosed for providing timing tracking loops in a communication system. A communication system includes a delay locked loop (DLL) comprising a maximum region detector configured to identify a target channel profile comprising at least a portion of the multipath signals based on the timing information, the maximum region detector further configured to apply a weight vector to each channel tap in the target channel profile and determine a tap with a maximum power level relative to remaining channel taps in the channel profile. The system further comprises a window timing loop (WTL) adjuster configured to track a position of a channel estimation window (CEW) within an observation window corresponding to the maximum channel energy level, where the maximum channel energy level corresponds to the sum of the energy of all the taps for a given window.