Tin Nanoparticle Synthesis via Chemical Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing tin nanoparticles for advanced lithium-based batteries result in large particle sizes and poor control over particle size distribution, leading to volume expansion and reduced charge/discharge capacity, and often contaminate the sample during the milling process.

Innovation Solution

A 'bottom-up' synthesis approach using an alkali metal and naphthalene as a reducing agent to form tin nanoparticles with controlled sizes, employing a capping agent to moderate particle growth and prevent aggregation, allowing for the production of nanoparticles as small as a few nanometers in diameter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If mechanical milling is used to reduce particle size, then particle size is reduced, but manufacturing precision and particle size control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical milling with a chemical reduction process. Tin ions in solution are reduced to tin nanoparticles through chemical reactions, eliminating the need for mechanical force. This substitution enables precise control over particle size through chemical parameters rather than mechanical parameters, resolving the contradiction between size reduction and size control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls particle size by changing chemical parameters such as reducing agent concentration, reaction temperature, and reaction time. By adjusting these parameters, the particle size can be precisely controlled within a narrow distribution range, overcoming the poor size control inherent in mechanical milling methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Length of moving object

If mechanical milling is used to reduce particle size, then particle size is reduced, but sample purity deteriorates due to contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidsample contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical milling with a chemical reduction process that occurs in solution. The tin nanoparticles form directly in the solution phase through chemical reduction of tin ions, eliminating contact with mechanical milling media that would cause contamination. The resulting particles are free from abrasion contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If particle size is not controlled, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but volume expansion and charge capacity deterioration worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size controlVSAvoidcharge capacity retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific ranges for chemical parameters (reducing agent to tin ion ratio, reaction temperature, reaction time) that directly control particle size and size distribution. By optimizing these parameters, the patent achieves narrow particle size distribution which prevents volume expansion and maintains charge capacity, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method produces tin nanoparticles with tighter size distribution and tailored surface characteristics, enhancing electrochemical properties and wettability with the electrolyte, leading to increased charge capacity and improved battery performance.

Implementation Method 1

combining a first solution comprising Sn ions with a second solution comprising a reducing agent. After the combination, the Sn ions and the reducing agent undergo a reaction in which at least some of the Sn ions are reduced to tin nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

the Sn ions and the reducing agent undergo a reaction in which at least some of the Sn ions are reduced to tin nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox Reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 3

The combined solution can further comprise a capping agent that moderates a growth of aggregates of the tin nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8192866B2Tin nanoparticles and methodology for making same
Publication Date: 2012.06.05 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US8192866B2 patent drawing
  • US8192866B2 patent drawing
  • US8192866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of preparing tin (Sn) nanoparticles based on a bottom-up approach is provided. The method includes combining a first solution comprising Sn ions with a second solution comprising a reducing agent. After the combination, the Sn ions and the reducing agent undergo a reaction in which at least some of the Sn ions are reduced to Sn nanoparticles. The first solution comprises a tin salt dissolved in a solvent; the second solution comprises an alkali metal and naphthalene dissolved in a solvent; and the combined solution further comprises a capping agent that moderates a growth of aggregates of the Sn nanoparticles.