Tine Workpiece Support Structure for Random Access Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wafer support and carrier architectures face challenges such as inefficient wafer mapping, increased complexity with larger wafers, and difficulties in simultaneous multiple wafer handling due to the need for precise and complex end effector movements, which can result in damage and contamination.

Innovation Solution

A tine structure with cantilevered supports that expose the wafer's peripheral edge and bottom surface, allowing end effectors to access wafers without traversing the entire wafer surface, enabling efficient random access and reduced risk of damage during handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional fixed-pitch shelves are used to support wafers, then wafers can be stored in the container, but access to the wafer's peripheral edge is blocked and complex end effector movements are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer accessVSAvoidend effector mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into multiple tines rather than using solid shelves, creating gaps between support elements that allow end effectors to access wafer edges and bottom surfaces more easily

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure transitions from horizontal shelf surfaces to vertical tine structures, allowing end effectors to approach wafers from the side and bottom rather than requiring top-down access through the wafer stack

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If end effector blade thickness increases to maintain deflection characteristics for larger wafers, then larger diameter wafers can be handled, but pitch between wafers must increase reducing storage capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer diameter handlingVSAvoidwafer storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector approaches wafers from the side and bottom through the tine gaps rather than from the top, eliminating the need for thick blades and allowing tight wafer spacing while maintaining structural integrity for large wafer handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If break-the-beam mapping is used to determine wafer position, then reliable wafer detection is achieved, but expensive and complex sensing mechanisms are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer detectionVSAvoidsensing mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tine support structure itself provides detection functionality through its interaction with wafers, eliminating the need for separate break-the-beam sensing systems by using the mechanical presence/absence of wafers on tines as the detection mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If end effector must travel between adjacent wafers to access them, then random access is possible, but travel time increases and risk of accidental contact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom accessVSAvoidend effector travel time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented tine structure creates direct access paths through the gaps between tines, allowing end effectors to reach wafers more directly without extensive travel between tightly spaced wafers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10434661B2Workpiece support structures and apparatus for accessing same
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 BROOKS AUTOMATION US LLC
  • US10434661B2 patent drawing
  • US10434661B2 patent drawing
  • US10434661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A workpiece container stores at least one workpiece having a bottom surface and a peripheral edge. In one embodiment, a workpiece support structure is located within the container enclosure, which forms multiple vertically stacked storage shelves within the enclosure. Each storage shelf includes, in one embodiment, a first tine and a second tine for supporting the workpiece in a substantially horizontal orientation. The bottom surface and peripheral edge of a workpiece seated on a storage shelf extends beyond the outer edge of both the first tine and the second tine. An end effector may engage these extended portions or “grip zones” of the workpiece.