Tire Deposition Control via Surface Scanning Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for applying additional components, such as self-sealing or noise-reducing materials, to vulcanized tires lack uniformity and flexibility, leading to potential imbalances and unevenness, especially at high speeds, due to inadequate control over deposition parameters and surface alignment.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a grip device, scanning head, and dispensing nozzle that generates a mathematical model of the internal tire surface to precisely control the deposition of additional components, ensuring uniformity and adjusting parameters like distance, orientation, and flow rate based on the tire's surface profile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing methods for applying additional components are used, then the deposition process is simple, but the uniformity and precision of deposition are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition uniformityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs a preliminary scan of the tire internal surface to generate a mathematical model before deposition begins. This preliminary action allows the system to anticipate surface irregularities and adjust deposition parameters in advance, ensuring uniform deposition without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the mathematical model of the tire surface is continuously referenced during deposition. The control unit adjusts deposition parameters based on the mathematical model data, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains high precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If existing deposition methods are used, then the process is flexible, but the control over deposition parameters is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition controlVSAvoidprocess flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of deposition parameters including distance, orientation, and flow rate based on the mathematical model of the tire surface. The system adapts these parameters in real-time during deposition to maintain precision while preserving process flexibility through programmable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes multiple deposition parameters (distance from nozzle to surface, orientation of nozzle, flow rate of material) based on the mathematical model data. This coordinated parameter adjustment achieves precise control while maintaining adaptability through the flexibility of the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If uniform deposition is achieved through manual adjustment, then the equipment is simple, but the time consumption and labor are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition uniformityVSAvoiddeposition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying deposition parameters based on the mathematical model of the tire surface. The control unit independently manages distance, orientation, and flow rate adjustments without requiring manual intervention, thereby achieving uniform deposition while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated control system that uses the mathematical model to regulate deposition parameters. This substitution eliminates labor-intensive manual operations while maintaining or improving deposition uniformity and increasing overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If the dispensing nozzle is positioned closer to the internal surface for better coverage, then the deposition completeness improves, but the risk of imbalance and unevenness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition completenessVSAvoidtire balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adjusting deposition parameters according to the specific characteristics of different areas of the tire internal surface. The mathematical model enables the system to optimize distance and flow rate for each local region, ensuring complete coverage while maintaining uniformity and balance across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes deposition parameters including distance and flow rate based on the mathematical model data for different tire regions. This coordinated parameter adjustment ensures complete material coverage while preventing localized over-deposition that could cause imbalance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3727822B1Process and plant for building an additional component within a vulcanised tyre
Publication Date: 2021.12.15 PIRELLI TYRE SPA
  • EP3727822B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3727822B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3727822B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A plant (100) for building an additional component (12) within a vulcanised tyre (2) comprises a grip device (110), a scanning head (121) and a dispensing nozzle (122). After gripping the vulcanised tyre (2) with the grip device (110), the scanning head (12) performs a preliminary scan of a deposition portion of the internal surface (2a) of the tyre and, based on this preliminary scan, a control unit (140) generates a mathematical model. Subsequently, while the dispensing nozzle (122) delivers a continuous elongated element (E) on the deposition portion according to a spiral trajectory, the control unit (140) controls the deposition process by adjusting at least one deposition parameter according to the mathematical model of the deposition portion.