Tire Pressure Detector Positioning Using Motion-Based Rechecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tire pressure monitoring systems require frequent repositioning of tire pressure detectors upon engine restart, leading to power consumption and positioning errors.

Innovation Solution

Each tire pressure detector records initial X, Y, and Z-axis data upon engine shutdown, periodically updates these data, and compares them with initial values upon engine restart; if no change is detected, the system continues using previous positioning data, otherwise, it initiates automatic positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the vehicle main unit performs repositioning for all tire pressure detectors every time the vehicle starts, then positioning accuracy is maintained, but power consumption increases and time is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing complete repositioning for all tire pressure detectors every time the vehicle starts, the system performs partial positioning only when necessary. The main unit sends positioning requests selectively based on whether the vehicle has moved, avoiding unnecessary positioning operations and reducing power consumption while maintaining positioning accuracy when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where tire pressure detectors report their positioning status and the main unit determines whether repositioning is necessary based on vehicle movement detection. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain positioning accuracy while avoiding unnecessary repositioning operations that consume power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the vehicle main unit performs repositioning for all tire pressure detectors every time the vehicle starts, then positioning errors are corrected, but time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidpositioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs positioning operations partially and selectively rather than completely and routinely. By determining whether vehicle movement has occurred before initiating repositioning, the system avoids unnecessary positioning operations that waste time while still correcting positioning errors when they actually occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If continuous repeated positioning operations are performed, then positioning errors are corrected, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing continuous repeated positioning operations, the system implements periodic positioning based on triggering conditions. The main unit determines whether positioning is needed by checking if the vehicle has moved, creating a periodic rather than continuous operation pattern that maintains positioning reliability while significantly reducing power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260091624A1Energy-saving positioning method for tire pressure detectors
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 SYSGRATION
  • US20260091624A1 patent drawing
  • US20260091624A1 patent drawing
  • US20260091624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy-saving positioning method for tire pressure detectors includes the following steps: the vehicle main unit determines whether the engine switch changes from on to off; each tire pressure detector records initial data of at least two axes (X, Y, Z); each detector periodically records subsequent axial data; the vehicle main unit sends an engine start signal to all detectors; each detector compares recorded values with the last recorded values to check for changes; the vehicle main unit evaluates position change messages from detectors and proceeds accordingly. If changes occurred, then go to Step 5A: the main unit skips automatic positioning and uses previous positioning data. If no changes occurred, then go to Step 5B: the main unit initiates automatic positioning. This method effectively reduces positioning frequency compared to traditional systems that require repositioning every engine restart, thereby achieving power conservation while maintaining system accuracy and reliability.