Automated Tire Downsizing With Mandrel Positioning and Shear Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional tire cutting apparatuses require significant power, labor, and human intervention, leading to inefficiencies and variability in cutting uniformity, especially when handling large tires, and are often limited in adaptability to different tire sizes and types.

Innovation Solution

An automated tire downsizing system comprising a loading/unloading cradle, a mandrel table, a cutting apparatus with adjustable blades, a power unit, and a control unit that coordinates precise positioning and cutting operations, allowing for customized cutting configurations and reduced operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional tire cutting apparatuses are used to cut through thick tire material, then cutting force and power requirements increase, but this results in larger machine size and heavy weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoidmachine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The tire cutting process is divided into multiple sequential cutting operations using several smaller cutting heads rather than one large high-force cutter. Each cutting head applies moderate force to make incremental cuts, segmenting the overall cutting task into manageable portions that reduce the force requirement for each individual cutting element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A mandrel is introduced as an intermediary device that the tire is mounted upon during cutting operations. The mandrel provides structural support and positioning, allowing the tire to be securely held and precisely positioned for cutting without requiring the cutting apparatus itself to have heavy-duty positioning and support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If traditional tire cutting apparatuses are used, then sufficient power is available to cut through tire material, but this requires significant human operator intervention and supervision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting powerVSAvoidoperator intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting apparatus is equipped with automated control systems that enable the machine to operate autonomously once the cutting parameters are set. The system can automatically position cutting heads, control cutting depth and speed, and monitor the cutting process, reducing the need for continuous human intervention and supervision during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor cutting progress and adjust operating parameters automatically. Sensors detect tire position, cutting depth, and blade wear, providing real-time feedback to the control system which then makes automatic adjustments to maintain optimal cutting conditions without requiring constant operator attention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional cutting machines are used to ensure uniformity of cut pieces, then operator variability affects cut consistency, but automated systems may be limited in adaptability to different tire sizes and types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut uniformityVSAvoidtire size adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting apparatus features dynamically adjustable parameters including cutting head position, cutting depth, blade speed, and spacing between cutting elements. These parameters can be modified in real-time through the control system to accommodate different tire sizes, types, and desired cut patterns, allowing the same machine to maintain precision across various tire configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple tire types and sizes using the same basic cutting mechanism. The combination of programmable control, adjustable parameters, and reconfigurable cutting head arrangements enables a single machine to perform diverse cutting operations on different tire configurations without requiring specialized equipment for each tire type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Force

If heavy machinery is used to position and stabilize large tires for cutting, then cutting force can be applied effectively, but this increases equipment complexity and operational difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting force applicationVSAvoidpositioning equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel serves as an intermediary support structure that simplifies tire positioning. Instead of requiring complex heavy-duty positioning equipment to hold and stabilize the tire directly, the tire is mounted on the mandrel which provides the necessary support and stability, allowing the cutting apparatus to focus on applying cutting force rather than also providing structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The mandrel table is designed to be both movable and rotatable, allowing the tire to be positioned at various orientations and locations to optimize cutting access. This flexible positioning capability eliminates the need for complex fixed heavy-duty positioning mechanisms by providing a simple, adaptable platform that can be easily adjusted to the required position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient, automated, and customizable tire downsizing with reduced labor costs and improved uniformity, capable of handling various tire sizes and types without the need for heavy machinery, ensuring precise cutting and streamlined operations.

Implementation Method 1

The blades contact opposite sides of a width of the tire to cut the tire in a shearing action, and remove a portion from the tire bead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShearing action: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS11235400B2Tire downsizing apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 TECH RUBBER CO INC
  • US11235400B2 patent drawing
  • US11235400B2 patent drawing
  • US11235400B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for downsizing tires are disclosed. An automated downsizing apparatus comprises a cradle, mandrel table, cutting apparatus, and a control unit. A tire mounted on the cradle may be received by the movable and rotatable mandrel table, and positioned for engagement with the cutting apparatus. A user may customize a cutting configuration to be executed by the control unit. The control unit positions the mandrel table and cutting apparatus to remove portions from the tire, according to the cutting configuration. During operation, one or more system parameters may be monitored to determine compliance with the selected configuration, and the automated execution may be manually overridden.