Tire Fabric with Breakable Bearing Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tires face challenges in achieving a good compromise between wear, grip, endurance, rolling resistance, and noise performance due to difficulties in meridian flattening, leading to uneven pressure distribution and increased weight, which affects their lifespan and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A tire assembly comprising a woven first fabric and a knitted second fabric connected by filamentary bearing elements, where the bearing elements are designed to elongate and break at specific points to allow for improved load distribution and flattening, reducing the weight and energy dissipation while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional tyre structures are used with high meridian curvature at shoulders, then structural strength is maintained, but flattening performance deteriorates leading to poor wear and grip characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear and grip performanceVSAvoidmeridian curvature at shoulders
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The tyre structure is segmented into distinct functional layers: a bearing structure with load-bearing elements, a carcass structure, and a tread structure. This segmentation allows the bearing structure to specifically address flattening requirements while other structures maintain their respective functions, resolving the contradiction between maintaining strength and achieving proper flattening geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing elements are designed with specific local properties - they have a first portion with high elasticity positioned at the shoulder region to enable flattening, while maintaining overall structural integrity. This local quality adjustment allows the shoulder region to achieve the desired low meridian curvature without compromising the tyre's overall strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If bearing structures with pressurized compartments are used to improve flattening, then flattening performance improves, but weight increases leading to higher energy dissipation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflattening performanceVSAvoidtyre weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the essential load-bearing function from complex pressurized compartment structures and implements it through a simplified bearing structure with elastic bearing elements arranged in a matrix. This extraction removes unnecessary weight while preserving the flattening performance by focusing only on the critical load-bearing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing elements are designed as flexible, thin-walled structures with high elasticity, allowing them to deform appropriately under load to achieve flattening. This flexible design provides the necessary flattening performance with minimal mass compared to rigid pressurized compartments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Strength

If sidewalls are connected to bearing structures to form closed cavities, then structural integrity improves, but meridian flattening becomes difficult due to raised pressures at shoulders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmeridian flattening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing elements are designed with asymmetric properties - the first portion has different elastic characteristics than the rest of the element. This asymmetry allows the shoulder region to deform differently under load, enabling proper flattening while the rest of the structure maintains its integrity and supports the load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing structure is designed to be dynamic rather than static - the bearing elements can change their stiffness characteristics based on the applied load and position within the tyre. This dynamic behavior allows the structure to adapt during operation, achieving both integrity and proper flattening geometry under service conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables improved flattening of the tire tread, leading to enhanced wear resistance, grip, and reduced rolling resistance, resulting in increased tire life and fuel efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the first filamentary member has a non-zero elongation and is not broken

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

there is an elongation of the woven first fabric, less than or equal to (2π×H)/L, beyond which the second filamentary member is broken

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS11331953B2Assembly comprising a partially breakable fabric and a supporting structure
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • US11331953B2 patent drawing
  • US11331953B2 patent drawing
  • US11331953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The assembly (24) comprises: a woven first fabric (26) comprising filamentary warp elements (64) comprising first and second filamentary members, a woven second fabric (28), a bearing structure (30) comprising filamentary bearing elements (32) connecting the woven first and second fabrics together. For a length at rest L of the woven first fabric (26): for any elongation of the woven first fabric (26) less than or equal to (2π×H)/L, the first filamentary member has a non-zero elongation and is not broken; there is an elongation of the woven first fabric (26), less than or equal to (2π×H)/L, and beyond which the second filamentary member is broken, in which H0×K≤H where H0 is the distance between the woven first and second fabrics (26, 28) when each filamentary bearing portion (74) is at rest, and K=0.50.