Tire Inventory Decision Support System for Demand Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The tire retail industry faces inefficiencies due to low inventory analytics and optimization, leading to stock shortages and increased reliance on distribution centers, with inventory decisions based on historical sales rather than predictive methods, resulting in higher costs and channel conflicts.

Innovation Solution

A decision support system that maps demand characteristics to tire sizes and brands, optimizing inventory allocation and reallocation across points of sale and regional hubs, using socio-demographics and actual inventory data to recommend optimal inventory levels and streamline demand forecasting, thereby minimizing special orders and channel conflicts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If inventory decisions are made based on historical sales analysis, then inventory management is simple and reliable, but inventory optimization is poor and stockouts occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory availabilityVSAvoidinventory analytics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary demand forecasting using machine learning models to predict future tire demand at each retail location before inventory replenishment decisions are made. This predictive approach allows the system to proactively allocate inventory to prevent stockouts rather than reactively responding to historical sales patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors actual sales data, inventory levels, and demand patterns, then uses this information to refine and update demand forecasts. This closed-loop system improves inventory optimization over time by learning from actual performance data and adjusting allocations accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If more SKUs are maintained in inventory, then product variety for consumers increases, but inventory complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct varietyVSAvoidinventory complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing inventory allocations to match the specific demand characteristics of each retail location. Instead of uniform inventory distribution, the system analyzes local factors such as climate, vehicle types, and customer preferences to determine which SKUs should be stocked at each location, thereby maintaining appropriate product variety without unnecessary inventory complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the inventory portfolio by categorizing tires into different groups based on demand characteristics, seasonal patterns, and profitability metrics. This segmentation allows the system to apply different inventory management strategies to different product groups, optimizing the balance between product variety and inventory complexity for each category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of energy

If distribution centers are used for just-in-time delivery, then inventory costs are reduced, but delivery time and reliability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory carrying costVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary demand forecasting to anticipate which tires will be needed at each location and when. Based on these predictions, the system pre-positions inventory at regional hubs before actual demand occurs, enabling faster local fulfillment without requiring constant just-in-time deliveries from distant distribution centers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces regional hubs as intermediary storage locations between distribution centers and retail stores. These hubs hold strategically allocated inventory that can be quickly distributed to local retailers, reducing both the need for expensive just-in-time deliveries and the inventory carrying costs at individual store levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If predictive demand forecasting is implemented, then inventory optimization improves, but system complexity and data requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory turnover efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service capabilities by automatically collecting sales data, analyzing demand patterns, and generating inventory allocation recommendations without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning models autonomously process data and adjust forecasts based on observed patterns, reducing the operational complexity despite the advanced analytics being employed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11507965B2Tire inventory decision support system
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11507965B2 patent drawing
  • US11507965B2 patent drawing
  • US11507965B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tire inventory decision support system (100) optimizes tire allocations across a plurality of trade areas for local tire dealers, as well as regional trade areas for tire repositories as regional fulfillment hubs. The system defines trade areas having demographic tire demand characteristics and corresponding to an available inventory population for respective dealers. For each trade area, optimal dealer inventory populations are projected for tire sizes and brands, based in part on the available inventory population for the dealer an actual inventory population for the associated tire repository. The system compares the optimal inventory population for each dealer to actual inventory population, and selectively generates dealer interfaces displaying recommendations for tire inventory modification based on value propositions as disparities between the optimal and actual inventory populations. The system may further identify value propositions for inventory reallocation by regional hubs themselves, based on aggregated inventory for associated dealers.