Tire Sidewall and Bead Layout for Low Rolling Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tires face a challenge in reducing rolling resistance without compromising handling performance and increasing manufacturing costs, as existing solutions either complicate industrial processing or incur significant cost increases.

Innovation Solution

The tire design incorporates two lower regions with elastomer compounds having a viscoelastic loss Tan(δ)max less than or equal to 0.10, occupying 30% to 90% of the volume, and an elastic shear modulus of 0.5 to 10 MPa for the sidewall layer, along with a balanced architecture that maintains handling capabilities without major process changes or cost increments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If elastomer compounds with low viscoelastic loss are used in the lower regions, then rolling resistance is reduced, but transverse slip stiffness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling resistanceVSAvoidtransverse slip stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different elastomer compound properties to different regions of the tire. The lower regions (beads and sidewalls) use compounds with low viscoelastic loss (Tan(δ)max ≤ 0.10) to reduce rolling resistance, while the crown region maintains compounds with higher transverse slip stiffness for handling performance. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between energy loss and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tire is divided into distinct functional segments: lower regions (beads and sidewalls) optimized for low rolling resistance, and crown regions optimized for transverse slip stiffness. The lower regions specifically include beads with filler layers and sidewalls with elastomer compounds having Tan(δ)max ≤ 0.10, while crown layers maintain different properties. This segmentation allows each region to independently optimize its performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If complex bead structures are implemented to reduce rolling resistance, then energy loss is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces rolling resistance by changing the viscoelastic parameters of the elastomer compounds in the lower regions rather than implementing complex structural modifications. Specifically, it specifies compounds with Tan(δ)max ≤ 0.10 at 100°C and 10 Hz, and controls elastic shear modulus in the range 0.5-10 MPa for sidewall layers. These parameter changes achieve energy loss reduction while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If sidewall layer stiffness is increased to improve handling, then transverse slip stiffness is improved, but rolling resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransverse slip stiffnessVSAvoidrolling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different elastomer compound properties to different regions of the tire. The lower regions (beads and sidewalls) use compounds with low viscoelastic loss (Tan(δ)max ≤ 0.10) to reduce rolling resistance, while the crown region maintains compounds with higher transverse slip stiffness for handling performance. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between energy loss and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively reduces rolling resistance while maintaining appropriate transverse slip stiffness and handling performance, keeping industrial manufacturing costs normal by optimizing elastomer compound properties and architecture.

Implementation Method 1

The elastomer compounds having an elastic shear modulus and a viscoelastic loss measured in accordance with ASTM D 5992-96, at 23° C., under a shear strain of 10%; said layers of compounds in each lower region having a viscoelastic loss Tan(δ)max less than or equal to 0.10

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

The elastomer compounds having an elastic shear modulus and a viscoelastic loss measured in accordance with ASTM D 5992-96, at 23° C., under a shear strain of 10%; said layers of compounds in each lower region having a viscoelastic loss Tan(δ)max less than or equal to 0.10

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis: Hysteresis

Implementation Method 3

The elastic shear modulus of each sidewall layer is in the range [0.5; 10] MPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240253396A1Tire having optimized performance in terms of rolling resistance and roadholding
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 MICHELIN & CO (CIE GEN DES ESTAB MICHELIN)
  • US20240253396A1 patent drawing
  • US20240253396A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a tyre (1) for a passenger vehicle of which the performance in terms of rolling resistance has been improved without adversely affecting the transverse slip stiffness. The bead (50) is made more flexible by the use of low-hysteresis materials. The transverse slip stiffness is compensated for through the use of a rigid, low-hysteresis sidewall layer (30). The layers of compounds of the lower region having a viscoelastic loss Tan(δ)max less than or equal to 0.10 represent a volume of between 30% and 90% of the total volume of said lower region, and the elastic shear modulus G′ (M3) of each sidewall layer is in the range [0.5; 10] MPa.