Tire Sipe Layout for Snow Grip and Dry Steering Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tires with sipes for improved on-snow performance tend to deteriorate steering stability on dry road surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A tire design featuring land portions with specific configurations of sipes, including first, second, and third sipes that incline in alternating directions, maintaining rigidity and closed ends within the ground-contacting surface, enhancing on-snow performance while preserving steering stability on dry roads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sipes are provided on land portions to improve on-snow performance, then on-snow performance is improved, but steering stability on dry road surfaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-snow performanceVSAvoidsteering stability on dry road surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing sipes only in specific regions (shoulder land portions and intermediate land portions) rather than uniformly across all land portions. The sipes are strategically positioned to improve on-snow performance in areas that benefit most from snow interaction, while preserving the rigidity of the crown land portion and other critical areas for steering stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the land portions into different functional zones: shoulder land portions with sipes for snow performance, intermediate land portions with selective siping, and crown land portions maintained for steering stability. This segmentation allows each region to optimize its function without compromising overall tire performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If sipes are added to improve on-snow performance, then on-snow performance is improved, but rigidity of land portions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-snow performanceVSAvoidrigidity of land portions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by varying the sipe configuration across different land portions. Shoulder land portions have sipes extending in multiple directions to maximize snow interaction, while intermediate land portions have sipes at specific angles (15-45 degrees) to balance snow performance with rigidity preservation. The crown land portion maintains higher rigidity by having fewer or no sipes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by providing sipes only where necessary for snow performance rather than across the entire tread. The sipes are concentrated in shoulder and intermediate regions where snow contact is most beneficial, while avoiding excessive siping that would compromise overall land portion rigidity and steering stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12545056B2Tire
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US12545056B2 patent drawing
  • US12545056B2 patent drawing
  • US12545056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tire comprises a tread portion comprising at least one land portion having a first longitudinal edge, a second longitudinal edge, and a ground contacting top surface therebetween. The land portion is provided with first sipes, second sipes and third sipes. Each first sipe is inclined with respect to the tire axial direction to a first direction. Each second sipe is inclined with respect to the tire axial direction to a direction opposite to the first direction. The third sipe comprises a first oblique portion extending from the first longitudinal edge and inclined to the first direction, and a second oblique portion extending from the second longitudinal edge and inclined to a direction opposite to the first direction.