Pneumatic Tire Tread Groove Design for Drainage and Wear Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heavy-duty tires face challenges in achieving a balance between improved drainage and wear resistance, as increased groove widths in block-type tread patterns enhance drainage but lead to increased wear due to higher load and rigidity reduction.

Innovation Solution

A pneumatic tire design featuring a unidirectional tread pattern with specific groove configurations, including inclined crown and middle axial grooves, zigzag middle main grooves, and notches on crown blocks, optimizing land ratios and groove widths to enhance both drainage and wear resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the groove widths are increased to improve drainage, then drainage performance is improved, but wear resistance deteriorates due to rigidity reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage performanceVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different groove widths to different regions of the tread pattern. The central main groove has a width of 15-25mm for superior drainage, while the side main grooves have widths of 10-20mm to balance drainage with wear resistance. This local differentiation allows each region to be optimized for its specific functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tread pattern is segmented into multiple functional zones with distinct groove configurations. The tread includes a central main groove, two side main grooves, and multiple axial grooves that divide the tread into crown blocks, middle blocks, and shoulder blocks. Each segment is designed with specific groove dimensions to address local drainage and wear resistance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the groove widths are increased to improve drainage, then drainage performance is improved, but block rigidity decreases leading to higher wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage performanceVSAvoidblock rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by specifying different groove widths for different blocks. Crown blocks (subjected to higher loads) have axial grooves of 8-15mm width, while middle blocks have axial grooves of 5-10mm width. This ensures that blocks in high-stress regions maintain higher rigidity while still achieving adequate drainage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the groove widths across different regions. By varying the width parameter from 5-25mm depending on the groove location and block type, the design optimizes the balance between drainage capability (requiring wider grooves) and rigidity maintenance (requiring narrower grooves).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2730434B1Pneumatic tire
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • EP2730434B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2730434B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A pneumatic tire has a unidirectional tread pattern. The land ratio of an imaginary crown region 5A is 0.75 to 0.85. The land ratio of an imaginary middle region 6A is 0.65 to 0.75. Crown axial grooves 4A and middle axial grooves 4B are inclined to the intended tire rotational direction toward the axially inside of the tire. The widths of the crown axial grooves 4A and the middle axial grooves 4B are 4.0 to 7.0 mm. The width of the crown axial grooves 4A is more than the width of a central main groove 3A and less than the width of middle main grooves 3B.