Tire Tread Wear Forecasting With Driver-Specific Wear Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring tire tread depth lack accuracy in forecasting when tires need to be replaced, failing to account for driver-specific factors that affect tire wear rate.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first device for measuring tire tread depth, a processing unit that calculates a wear rate based on tread depth measurements and customer-specific factors, and a second device for communicating a forecast to the customer when the tread depth is expected to fall below a predetermined threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional tread depth measurement methods are used, then measurement capability is provided, but forecasting accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecasting accuracyVSAvoiddriver-specific factors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection of driver-specific factors (driving habits, vehicle type, climate conditions) before tread wear occurs, establishing a baseline profile that enables accurate forecasting of future wear patterns. This preliminary characterization of the driver-culture-vehicle system allows the algorithm to predict when tread depth will fall below thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual tread depth measurements and comparing them against forecasted values based on driver-specific factors. This feedback loop allows the algorithm to refine its predictions and adapt to actual wear patterns, improving forecasting accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple tread measurements are taken per tire, then measurement completeness is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple individual tread depth measurements into a single representative value per tire by calculating the minimum depth across all measurement points. This consolidation approach maintains reliability by capturing the worst-case scenario while simplifying subsequent data processing and forecasting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the critical minimum tread depth value from multiple measurements, discarding redundant data points. This extraction principle maintains measurement completeness by ensuring the minimum value is captured while reducing data processing complexity by focusing only on the most relevant metric for safety forecasting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250100330A1Forecasting tire tread depth
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 VALVOLINE LICENSING & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
  • US20250100330A1 patent drawing
  • US20250100330A1 patent drawing
  • US20250100330A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for forecasting a depth of a tire tread are provided herein. The system includes a first device, a processing unit, and a second device. The first device measures tire tread depth associated with a customer. The first device communicates with the processing unit to calculate a wear rate. The processing unit uses the calculated wear rate to determine when the depth of the tire tread will decrease below a predetermined threshold, which is communicated to the second device.