Tire Wear Estimation Using Acceleration Peak Ratios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for estimating tire wear amount are inaccurate on snow-covered road surfaces due to disturbances in acceleration waveforms caused by uneven road surfaces, leading to inconsistencies in differentiated peak values.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects radial acceleration using an acceleration sensor, extracts and differentiates acceleration waveforms, calculates leading-end and trailing-end differentiated peak values, and uses peak ratios within specific ranges to improve wear estimation accuracy by excluding disturbed data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If acceleration waveform data is collected from snow-covered road surfaces, then more measurement data is obtained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to waveform disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of acceleration waveform dataVSAvoidprecision of tire wear estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter selection criteria by introducing differentiated peak ratio as a filtering parameter. Data points with differentiated peak ratios outside the specified range (0.6-1.2) are excluded from wear estimation calculations, thereby maintaining measurement precision while utilizing available data from snow-covered roads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by selectively processing different portions of the acceleration waveform data. Specifically, only those local segments (differentiated peak values) that meet the ratio criterion are used for wear estimation, while disturbed segments are excluded, thus maintaining overall system precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If all differentiated peak values are used for wear estimation, then calculation complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inclusion of disturbed data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of wear estimation calculationVSAvoidreliability of tire wear estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new parameter (differentiated peak ratio within 0.6-1.2 range) as a filtering criterion. This parameter change enables the system to automatically distinguish between reliable and unreliable data points, improving reliability without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically filtering out disturbed data points through the differentiated peak ratio calculation. The calculation unit itself identifies and excludes unreliable data without external intervention, maintaining reliability while keeping the overall system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If differentiated peak values from disturbed waveforms are excluded, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional filtering steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of tire wear estimationVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter change by introducing the differentiated peak ratio as an additional calculation parameter. This parameter serves as a simple mathematical filter that can be computed from existing data, improving precision without requiring complex hardware modifications or sophisticated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces potential mechanical filtering methods with mathematical computation. Instead of using physical filters or complex signal processing hardware, the system uses software-based differentiation and ratio calculation to filter out disturbed data, reducing hardware complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10471779B2Tire wear amount estimating method and tire wear amount estimating apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 BRIDGESTONE CORP
  • US10471779B2 patent drawing
  • US10471779B2 patent drawing
  • US10471779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus capable of estimating a tire wear amount even on snow-covered road surfaces accurately and reliably are provided. To that end, a differentiated acceleration waveform of a radial acceleration waveform of a tire is obtained, and an operation of calculating a leading-end differentiated peak value and a trailing-end differentiated peak value from the differentiated acceleration waveform is repeated a plurality of times. At the same time, a differentiated peak ratio, which is a ratio between the leading-end differentiated peak value and the trailing-end differentiated peak value, is calculated for each of the leading-end differentiated peak values and the trailing-end differentiated peak values obtained. Either one of the leading-end differentiated peak values and the trailing-end differentiated peak values, having a differentiated peak ratio within a lower limit range of 0.6 to 0.8 and an upper limit range of 1.0 to 1.2, or computed values of the leading-end differentiated peak values and the trailing-end differentiated peak values are extracted as the differentiated peak values for wear estimation. And the tire wear amount is estimated using the plurality of extracted differentiated peak values for wear estimation.